They felt it was creating a strong national government that could deny rights for citizens
they were against ratifying the constitution
The anti-federalist stood for not ratifying the constitution. Consequentially, Federalist stood for the ratification of the constitution. -Thomas Jefferson
No. David Brearley was not an anti-federalist. He voted yes for the ratification of the constitution at the ratifying convention.
The major argument put worth by the anti-federalists for not ratifying the U. S. Constitution was that it gave the national government too much power. Patrick Henry is an example of someone who was a prominent anti-federalist.
no, the federalist were in favor of the constitution being ratified, that's why they are called the ANTI- federalists. they did not want it to be ratified
The Federalists, who were for the ratification of the Constitution, and the Anti-federalists, who were against the ratification.
The Anti-Federalists did not like the new strength the central government would possess. Additionally, the constitution did not have a Bill of Rights when the states were in the ratifying process.
they wre afrais that if they would ratify (officialy approve) the constitution that they would lose their independence. *by lori
they wre afrais that if they would ratify (officialy approve) the constitution that they would lose their independence. *by lori
anti federalist are people who are against the constitution and federalist are people who want the constitution
Because they were in favor of government making all the descisions and not the individual states each ratifying the constitution....
The anti-federalists objected the constitution because they thought it made the central government too strong and feared that the US would become a monarchy.