Certain parts of the South had large numbers of slaves due to factors such as the labor-intensive crops grown in those regions, such as cotton and tobacco, which required a large workforce. Additionally, areas with more fertile soil and longer growing seasons were more suited for plantation agriculture, leading to higher concentrations of slaves in those regions. Economic and social factors also played a role in determining where slavery was more prevalent.
Certain parts of the South had large numbers of slaves due to the labor-intensive nature of agriculture, particularly crops like cotton, tobacco, and rice. Slavery was seen as an effective and cost-efficient way to sustain and expand these plantation economies. Additionally, historical and cultural practices perpetuated the institution of slavery in these regions.
No, a large majority of the southern population did not own slaves. In fact, only a small percentage of white families in the southern states owned slaves during the antebellum period.
Plantations required a large number of slaves due to the labor-intensive nature of agricultural work like planting, tending, and harvesting crops. The profitability of plantations relied on having a cheap and abundant workforce to cultivate and process the crops for export. Many slaves were needed to provide the necessary labor for large-scale production at plantations.
Most slaves in the United States lived on small to medium-sized plantations rather than large plantations. Small plantations were more common and typically held fewer than 50 slaves, while large plantations with hundreds of slaves were less common.
The northern colonies had less reliance on plantation agriculture, which required large numbers of slaves, whereas the southern colonies relied heavily on cash crops like cotton and tobacco that necessitated a large labor force. Additionally, the climate and topography of the southern colonies were more conducive to slave labor in agriculture compared to the northern colonies.
They could not compete with large landowners who had slaves
Large numbers of foriegn peoples who had been captured in different wars were brought back to Italy as slaves.
large numbers of surplus slaves were sold from the upper South to the lower South.
An equation used to graph certain numbers.
england
:'/ states with a large number of slaves. ;}
They had large numbers of slaves... if that's what you're looking for. The Compromise of 1850 led to the Fugitive Slave Act, and that tightened the control of any runaway slave. Also, even when the slave tradewas stopped, the practice of slavery wasn't. Therefore, many slave owners bred the slaves they had a lot more rigorously than they would have if slaves were still being imported. because of that, the number of new slaves every year increased.
Yes after about 1500BC when large numbers of prisoners of war came into the possession of the Egyptians.
england
england
england
england