0
because they were gay against each other
Leta Davis
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Why did the people conquered by Cyrus seldom rebel?
They didn't seldom rebel because he let them keep their own customs
What did the Romans learn about gaining loyalty of conquered people?
The Romans learned early on that gaining the loyalty of conquered people is important. If not, these people are sure to rebel.
How did rome treat conquered people?
The initial treatment depended on the manner of annexation. Some areas were conquered as a result of wars fought against the Romans. In these cases tens of thousands of war captives were sold as slaves after victory in battle. In two cases (Carthage and Corinth) cites were destroyed. In two cases, kings (in western Turkey) who had been allies of Rome, bequeathed their kingdoms to Rome. In some cases the Romans set up client states by putting in charge rulers who supported them. In other cases the conquered areas went through periods of pacification; that is, the Romans had to fight counter-insurgency campaigns. In the longer run, Roman rule was benign. The conquered peoples were free to follow their religions and customs and to continue to use their customary laws for local matters. Without this kind of policy, Rome would not have been able to rule such a vast empire with such a large range of different ethnicities, cultures and religions. The empire became a multicultural entity. Before all the peoples in the empire were granted Roman citizenship (and the rights which went with this), the conquered peoples already enjoyed the protections given by Roman law. Civil disputes between Roman citizens and non-citizens were adjudicated by an official whose rulings were based on the tenets of Roman law. To promote cohesion the Romans promoted the diffusion of an imperial ideology. For some peoples Roman rule was advantageous because the Romans guaranteed law and order, built roads, aqueducts and carried out other infrastructure projects and their areas became integrated in the trading network of the empire. One example of this was Nabatea, which did not resit Roman occupation because it was going to be economically beneficial. However, the Romans dealt with rebellion in a ruthless manner, as the case of Judea shows.
What angered the subjects of the Persian Empire and caused them to rebel?
The Persian Empire stretched from present-day Pakistan to Libya, and so was composed of many different peoples and cultures. Persia tried to run a stable structure, imposing bearable taxes, maintaining peace, and protecting from external invaders. Each province had it own flashpoint, and rebellions broke out from time to time - Egypt, the Greek cities of Asia Minor, the Scythians and so on. Rebellions were usually promoted by local opportunists seeking to gain from provoking rebellions. The Greek tyrant of Miletus persuaded the Persians to support him in an attempt to capture the island of Naxos. It failed and to protect himself against a Persian reprisal, he roused up the Greek city-states of Ionia to rebel against Persia.
What angers the subjects if Persian Empire and caused them to rebel?
The Greek city-states in Asia Minor were tricked into revolt by the Greek tyrant of Miletus to protect himself against Persian retaliation for his misconduct.
Why did groups resent the Aztecs?
The Aztecs were an imperial state that had conquered numerous other local tribes. From these conquered peoples, the Aztecs demanded human sacrifices so that they could appease the Aztec gods. The constant forced tribute of young men for sacrifices angered these tribes mightily. As a result when the arrival of the Spaniards changed the power dynamic and allowed them to rebel against the Aztecs, they took the opportunity, not realizing that they had simply chosen a different demon.
When do people have a right to rebel against their government?
when the government takes away peoples rights
Why did few people rebel against Cyrus?
Becuase cyrus let the people he conquered keep thier own customs.
Romans usually did not try to change the customs and religions of the peoples they conquered what was the effect?
The policy of tolerance of the customs and religions of the conquered peoples made Roman rule more acceptable to them and decreased the risk of rebellion. In addition to this, the Romans also allowed the elites of the conquered peoples to run local affairs and to use their customary laws locally. This also decreased the administrative load of the provincial governors, whose role was defence and the maintenance of the legions stationed in their province, tax collection, public works and resolving disputes the locals were not able to sort out themselves.
Why did peoples conquered by Cyrus the Great seldom rebel?
Cyrus the Great actively reached out to minorities and tribes in the areas he conquered and gave them a stake in the local government and the maintenance of their holy places. Since Cyrus' Empire did not seek to quash minority rights, but improve them, the conquered people aligned with the government forces, leading to general peace and security within the Persian Empire under his rule. Some modern governments might learn something from his example.
What soldier is a rebel?
rebel is a person who goes against his/her superiors. A rebel soldier would rebel against his/her country's army or organization. MistroJoe
Why did the people conquered by Cyrus seldom rebel?
They didn't seldom rebel because he let them keep their own customs
What problems were caused by the new wealth and grain that flowed into Rome from conquered lands?
The people who had to give the stuff felt resentment against the Roman Empire and may later rebel
Why did peoples conqueredble by Cyrus the great seldom rebel?
n
What are the two meanings for rebel?
noun;Someone going against an event;for example;I am going to be a rebel and not vote for Donald Trump.Other definition for rebel is rebel with a standed out e.adjective;future word for rebel;for example,I'm going to rebel against Donald trump
How is rebel used as a verb in a sentence?
Teenagers rebel against rules.
Do you have a right to rebel against your?
Yes It is not only the right but the duty of all people to rebel against the government when the government no longer serves the interest of the people. The people are the country. We elect people to represent us to the world. When those representatives no longer act on the peoples voice it is time for the people to rise up and replace it with one that does.
