he thought independence and being uniting was the only way to have a strong government
the powers of the federal government are explicitly granted by the constitution
They didn't support the Constitution because they thought that the Constitution gave too much power to the federal government.
The Anti-Federalists were of the idea a weaker federal government in favor of stronger state legislatures and did not entertain the idea of a new constitution.
Actually, it was the Constitution that favored the Federalists. The Federalists generally favored the U.S. Constitution as providing for a federal nation. As opposed to the anti-Federalists, who favored the confederal model of a "united States" provided for in the preceding Articles of Confederation.Probably the best answer to why is that a federal model represented a conceptual compromise between that of a confederal state and that of a unitary state.The Constitution provided for (1) a federated congressional presidential republic; with (2) a supreme but limited federal government; and, (3) States co-sovereign with the federal government; and, (4) to whom residual powers were reserved.This has become known in U.S. Constitutional law as our federalism.
The budget of Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution is 155,238,306 euros.
the powers of the federal government are explicitly granted by the constitution
novanet- the powers of the federal government are explicitly granted by the constitution
They didn't support the Constitution because they thought that the Constitution gave too much power to the federal government.
Absolutely. Marshall was a loyal federalist who strongly believed in the value of the Constitution. As Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, he helped ensure the Articles of the Constitution empowered the federal government.
The Anti-Federalists were of the idea a weaker federal government in favor of stronger state legislatures and did not entertain the idea of a new constitution.
No. Because of the tendency of the Supreme Court to rule in favor of the federal government as well as the "supremacy clause" (Federal Laws override state laws if there is a conflict) in the constitution, the federal government exercises more authority and overall power than state governments.
President Jackson was in favor of loose construction because he believed in a broad interpretation of the Constitution. He viewed the federal government as having more power and authority, allowing it to take action in areas not explicitly mentioned in the Constitution. This approach allowed him to pursue his policy agenda effectively.
Decentralists favored a strict interpretation of the Constitution.
Loose construction-means that the federal government can take reasonable actions that the constitution does not specifically forbidStrict construction- people who favor strict constitution think that that federal government should do only what the constitution specifically says it can do The Loose Construction Theory is when federalists interpret the Constitution into things that are in favor of a stronger national government. There are limitations involved.
they are in favor of it
they were not in favor of it
no, the federalist were in favor of the constitution being ratified, that's why they are called the ANTI- federalists. they did not want it to be ratified