Want this question answered?
There was no disgrace. It was always an honour to be a knight.
The phrase "When in disgrace with fortune and mens eyes" refers to being poor and looked down upon by those around you. The word "disgrace" takes on an especially poetic meaning here--without grace--and leads the reader to feel that the speaker doesn't deserve to be looked down upon, and acts tonally to make the reader side with the speaker.
sin and disgrace
No they did not. They thought it was a disgrace to hide their true self under clothing.
In Roman society the paterfamilia was the head of the family. He was the eldest male and was responsible for the conduct of the family in social, political, and financial matters. Technically all the family's possessions belonged to him and even his adult sons could not own property unless "freed" by the paterfamilia. Any honor that came to the family was an honor for him, but any disgrace that befell a family was a personal disgrace to him.In Roman society the paterfamilia was the head of the family. He was the eldest male and was responsible for the conduct of the family in social, political, and financial matters. Technically all the family's possessions belonged to him and even his adult sons could not own property unless "freed" by the paterfamilia. Any honor that came to the family was an honor for him, but any disgrace that befell a family was a personal disgrace to him.In Roman society the paterfamilia was the head of the family. He was the eldest male and was responsible for the conduct of the family in social, political, and financial matters. Technically all the family's possessions belonged to him and even his adult sons could not own property unless "freed" by the paterfamilia. Any honor that came to the family was an honor for him, but any disgrace that befell a family was a personal disgrace to him.In Roman society the paterfamilia was the head of the family. He was the eldest male and was responsible for the conduct of the family in social, political, and financial matters. Technically all the family's possessions belonged to him and even his adult sons could not own property unless "freed" by the paterfamilia. Any honor that came to the family was an honor for him, but any disgrace that befell a family was a personal disgrace to him.In Roman society the paterfamilia was the head of the family. He was the eldest male and was responsible for the conduct of the family in social, political, and financial matters. Technically all the family's possessions belonged to him and even his adult sons could not own property unless "freed" by the paterfamilia. Any honor that came to the family was an honor for him, but any disgrace that befell a family was a personal disgrace to him.In Roman society the paterfamilia was the head of the family. He was the eldest male and was responsible for the conduct of the family in social, political, and financial matters. Technically all the family's possessions belonged to him and even his adult sons could not own property unless "freed" by the paterfamilia. Any honor that came to the family was an honor for him, but any disgrace that befell a family was a personal disgrace to him.In Roman society the paterfamilia was the head of the family. He was the eldest male and was responsible for the conduct of the family in social, political, and financial matters. Technically all the family's possessions belonged to him and even his adult sons could not own property unless "freed" by the paterfamilia. Any honor that came to the family was an honor for him, but any disgrace that befell a family was a personal disgrace to him.In Roman society the paterfamilia was the head of the family. He was the eldest male and was responsible for the conduct of the family in social, political, and financial matters. Technically all the family's possessions belonged to him and even his adult sons could not own property unless "freed" by the paterfamilia. Any honor that came to the family was an honor for him, but any disgrace that befell a family was a personal disgrace to him.In Roman society the paterfamilia was the head of the family. He was the eldest male and was responsible for the conduct of the family in social, political, and financial matters. Technically all the family's possessions belonged to him and even his adult sons could not own property unless "freed" by the paterfamilia. Any honor that came to the family was an honor for him, but any disgrace that befell a family was a personal disgrace to him.
If the ancestor was a disgrace then that person will look at them as a joke.
If you say that someone is in disgrace, you are emphasizing that other people disapprove of them and do not respect them because of something that they have done. Am I a disgrace?
"His dishonest acts made him a disgrace to his family and his community." "The soldier was certain he was returning home in disgrace, only to find that during his absence, he had been awarded several medals for bravery."
There was no disgrace. It was always an honour to be a knight.
No Place for Disgrace was created in 1988.
Depending on context, disgrace can be translated as:SchandeBlamageSchmachUngnadeSchweinerei
condemnation, disgrace
Yes, the noun 'disgrace' is an abstract noun; a word for a loss of honor, respect, or reputation; a word for a concept.The noun 'disgrace' is a concrete noun as a word for a person or thing that causes shame.The word 'disgrace' is also a verb: disgrace, disgraces, disgracing, disgraced.
Amazing Disgrace was created on 1996-05-14.
Schoolboys in Disgrace was created on 1975-08-19.
In times of personal misfortune or disgrace and when facing judgment or criticism from others.
After the scandal broke, the governor was forced to resign in disgrace. When Joe was caught stealing from our neighbors, it was a disgrace to our whole family.