they didn't have representation
The sugar act pressented James Otis who argued that "England colonies cant be taxed with out colonies consent but in 1765 Parliament passed the stamp act which dissobayed the the rule not to tax without their consent
No, the colonists didn't agree with the Sugar Act and Stamp Act. The colonists protested because each act put taxes on stamps, sugar, molasses and more. Colonists thought it was unfair to them because the British were taxing them. They protested at the side of more acts and they eventually had the Revolutionary War.
King George the III passed the Quarting Act, the Stamp Act, and the Sugar Act.Read more: What_acts_did_King_George_III_pass
Britain passed the stamp act because they needed more of this:$$$
Excessive taxation by the British for the goods imported by Americans; the taxation acts got progressively more excessive after the Sugar and Stamp Acts, resulting in what Americans called "The Intolerable Acts", which further taxed paper goods, certain kinds of cloth, and well, we got sick of it.
Well first.. the stamp act was not a person it was a act. The stamp act was placed on everything from important documents to playing cards and dice. Most merchants did not like the stamp act because the merchants had to pay for the stamps which meant the price of that object was going to be more and the higher the price was 4 that object the less people wanted to buy the object. Most stamp agents were tarred and feathered and some hanged! The PATRIOTS did not want to pay the tax, the LOYALIST wanted to pay the tax.
The sugar act pressented James Otis who argued that "England colonies cant be taxed with out colonies consent but in 1765 Parliament passed the stamp act which dissobayed the the rule not to tax without their consent
The stamp and sugar act happened because the british were taxing the colonists on little things such as stamp and sugar. The colonists, of course, protested. This lead to the Boston Tea Party. The stamp and sugar act happened because the british were taxing the colonists on little things such as stamp and sugar. The colonists, of course, protested. This lead to the Boston Tea Party.
No, the colonists didn't agree with the Sugar Act and Stamp Act. The colonists protested because each act put taxes on stamps, sugar, molasses and more. Colonists thought it was unfair to them because the British were taxing them. They protested at the side of more acts and they eventually had the Revolutionary War.
Because the sugar act actually lowered taxes on molasses but the tax was actually enforced and the stamp act raised taxes on many printed materials
sugar free gum has no sugar in it ,but regular gum has more sugar. more sugar in gum causes people to be diabetics
Nicotine. Sugar is not addicting. It is the object of a compulsion, but the compound itself is not involved in the dependency, which is emotional in origin.
THE SUGAR MACHINE you can get it from your local supermarket. It can measure the mass, weight and size of any pieces of sugar. Sugar cubes, brown sugar, white sugar and more!
The Sugar Act, Passed in 1764, the act taxed several items, including molasses, lumber and sugar, that the colonies imported from foreign ports. The Stamp Act, Passed in 1765, the act taxed all court documents and attorneys' licenses.
people didnt like it because they had to pay more for stamps
A stamp is worth more unused
The stamp act was really more of the same of what they had been doing. The difference was up to that point the laws and acts being enacted were becoming more and more harsh and unfair, then came the stamp act which was absolutely foolish and it pushed the people to more anger.