Want this question answered?
Most scientists originally reject the theory of continental drift since it did clearly explain continents would move. This is a theory that has been established by Wegener and did not get good support initially.
It means there is no reason why he should reject it, whether because there is no evidence to the contrary or because an experiment set up to test it affirmed that hypothesis.
That he either found it to be incorrect or heard from a majority of other scientists working in the same field of study that the hypothesis isn't true. Though it's almost always the first one I said.
reject mediocrity means that you dont accept average.
Copernicus did not reject the idea that planetary orbits around our Sun were circular.
reject
Perhaps you meant "Wegener's ideas".
that thars not enuph proph
that thars not enuph proph
They rejected Wegener's theory for half a century because he could not identify the cause of continental drift.
if the hypothesis is proven to be correct or incorrect
Most scientists originally reject the theory of continental drift since it did clearly explain continents would move. This is a theory that has been established by Wegener and did not get good support initially.
Scientists treat all theories the same way, popular or not. They will reject any theory if evidence appears which contradicts it.
because he had no evidence that the plates had moved so nobody belevied him
He could not prove how they moved he died before they considered his hypothesis
He could not prove how they moved he died before they considered his hypothesis
It means there is no reason why he should reject it, whether because there is no evidence to the contrary or because an experiment set up to test it affirmed that hypothesis.