0
Most scientists rejected Alfred Wegener's theory of continental drift for nearly half a century primarily because he could not provide a convincing mechanism for how continents could move. His proposal lacked solid geological evidence and was seen as speculative, leading to skepticism among the scientific community. Additionally, the dominant geological theories of the time, such as fixed continents and land bridges, were more widely accepted. It wasn't until the development of plate tectonics in the mid-20th century, which provided a robust framework for understanding continental movement, that Wegener's ideas gained acceptance.
What else can I help you with?
What dose it mean if a scientists fails to reject a hypothesis?
It means there is no reason why he should reject it, whether because there is no evidence to the contrary or because an experiment set up to test it affirmed that hypothesis.
What does it mean for scientist to reject a hypothesis?
That he either found it to be incorrect or heard from a majority of other scientists working in the same field of study that the hypothesis isn't true. Though it's almost always the first one I said.
Why did most scientists originally reject the theory of continental drift?
Most scientists originally reject the theory of continental drift since it did clearly explain continents would move. This is a theory that has been established by Wegener and did not get good support initially.
What did Copernicus not reject?
Copernicus did not reject the idea that planetary orbits around our Sun were circular.
When scientists discovered that atoms are composed of smaller particles why didn't they reject atomic theory?
Scientists did not reject atomic theory upon discovering that atoms are composed of smaller particles because atomic theory had already provided a robust framework for understanding matter and its properties. The discovery of subatomic particles, such as electrons, protons, and neutrons, actually refined and expanded atomic theory rather than negating it. These discoveries revealed that atoms are not indivisible but are structured entities, leading to a more nuanced understanding of chemical behavior and interactions at the atomic level. This evolution of atomic theory has continued to enhance our comprehension of the physical world.
What is nearly same as deny?
reject
Why did scientists reject Wagner's ides?
Perhaps you meant "Wegener's ideas".
What might cause a scientists to reject a theory?
that thars not enuph proph
What might cause scientists to reject a popular theory?
that thars not enuph proph
Why did most scientist reject wegeners theory for nearly half the centry?
Most scientists rejected Alfred Wegener's theory of continental drift for nearly half a century primarily because he could not provide a convincing mechanism for how continents could move. His ideas contradicted the prevailing belief in a static Earth, and his explanations lacked sufficient geological evidence. Additionally, the scientific community favored alternative theories, such as land bridges and fixed continents, which seemed more plausible at the time. It wasn't until the development of plate tectonics in the mid-20th century, which provided a solid framework and evidence for continental movement, that Wegener's ideas gained acceptance.
How do scientists decide whether or not to reject or accept a hypothesis?
if the hypothesis is proven to be correct or incorrect
What might cause scienctists to reject a popular theory?
Scientists treat all theories the same way, popular or not. They will reject any theory if evidence appears which contradicts it.
Why did scientists reject Wagner's hypothesis?
He could not prove how they moved he died before they considered his hypothesis
Why did scientists reject wegener theory?
because he had no evidence that the plates had moved so nobody belevied him
Why did many scientists reject Wagner's hypothesis?
He could not prove how they moved he died before they considered his hypothesis
What dose it mean if a scientists fails to reject a hypothesis?
It means there is no reason why he should reject it, whether because there is no evidence to the contrary or because an experiment set up to test it affirmed that hypothesis.
Why was Wegener's hypothesis reject?
Alfred Wegener couldn't describe how the plate tectonics moved. So, scientists rejected his hypothesis.
