0
Most scientists rejected Alfred Wegener's theory of continental drift for nearly half a century primarily because he could not provide a convincing mechanism for how continents could move. His ideas contradicted the prevailing belief in a static Earth, and his explanations lacked sufficient geological evidence. Additionally, the scientific community favored alternative theories, such as land bridges and fixed continents, which seemed more plausible at the time. It wasn't until the development of plate tectonics in the mid-20th century, which provided a solid framework and evidence for continental movement, that Wegener's ideas gained acceptance.
What else can I help you with?
Why did most scientists reject Wegner theory for nearly a half century?
They rejected Wenger's theory for half a century because he didn't have the evidence to prove his theory No, He did have evidence to prove his theory, they just did not believe him- TheSystem because of their lack of knowledge of the Earth He actually had evidence, but it was actually because the hypothesis interferred with their own hypothesis about how mountains form.
What might cause a scientists to reject a theory?
that thars not enuph proph
Why did many scientists reject Wagner's hypothesis?
He could not prove how they moved he died before they considered his hypothesis
Why did most scientists reject wegener theory for nearly a half century?
Most scientists rejected Wegener's theory of continental drift for nearly half a century because he lacked a plausible mechanism to explain how continents moved. Additionally, his ideas went against existing geological beliefs at the time, and he faced strong opposition from influential geologists who defended the prevailing theory of stationary continents. It wasn't until the development of the theory of plate tectonics, which provided a mechanism for the movement of continents, that Wegener's ideas gained widespread acceptance.
Why did the scientific community reject jolettas theory?
The scientific community rejected Joletta's theory primarily due to a lack of empirical evidence and reproducibility. Critics pointed out that the methodology used in her experiments was flawed, leading to results that could not be reliably replicated by other researchers. Additionally, her conclusions did not align with established scientific principles, making it difficult for her theory to gain acceptance. Overall, the combination of insufficient data and methodological issues undermined her credibility in the field.
What is nearly same as deny?
reject
What is a Valid reason why a scientist might reject a scientific theory?
its to old
What is a valid reason a scientist might reject a scientific theory?
It is to old
Why might a scientist reject a scientific theory?
there might not be enough proof
What does it a scientist fails to reject a hypothesis?
the hypothesis has not been proven wrong.
What is one way a scientist reject a experiment?
It can be rejected if there is no control variable.
What do scientist do after they have tested a hypothesis?
Depending on the results of that test, either accept or reject that hypothesis.
Why did scientist reject wegener's hypothesis?
because he didn't know how the tectonic plates/continents moved
What does it mean when a scientist fails to reject a hypothesis?
It means that the experiment is consistent with the hypothesis. It adds to the credibility of the hypothesis.
What dose it mean if a scientist fails to reject a hypothesis?
It means there is no reason why he should reject it, whether because there is no evidence to the contrary or because an experiment set up to test it affirmed that hypothesis.
What dose it mean if a scientist fail to reject a hypothesis?
It means there is no reason why he should reject it, whether because there is no evidence to the contrary or because an experiment set up to test it affirmed that hypothesis.
What is a valid reason why a scientist might reject a scientific therory?
A scientist might reject a scientific theory if new empirical evidence contradicts its predictions or underlying principles. For instance, if experimental results consistently show outcomes that the theory cannot explain or predict accurately, this would undermine its validity. Additionally, if a theory fails to account for a significant body of existing data or if a more comprehensive alternative theory emerges, a scientist may deem it necessary to reject the original theory.
