there might not be enough proof
Scientists treat all theories the same way, popular or not. They will reject any theory if evidence appears which contradicts it.
that thars not enuph proph
Theories are ideas, educatied ideas, but still only ideas. A scientist may change a scientific theory if new facts or information are found, if other scientists' review find errors, if attempts to apply the theory are unsuccessful, or if they see that the calculations are wrong when they double check them, and so then they would retest and rewrite their theory to correct the errors.Science is testing a belief with the means to disprove it and being unable to do so.Scientific Fact = something that has yet to be disproved.
This is my rather informal answer, so take it with a grain of salt: Theories are rejected/ignored when they do not have a good backing or implications that they might be correct, and are conclusively rejected when experimental data disagrees with them. Theories are considered when they seem plausible, and if all experimental data agrees with them, they are accepted.
observe the natural world
its to old
It is to old
A scientist can check their work/lab. Do it again. But their is really no way to say that is is actually true.
that thars not enuph proph
Scientists treat all theories the same way, popular or not. They will reject any theory if evidence appears which contradicts it.
that thars not enuph proph
Theories are ideas, educatied ideas, but still only ideas. A scientist may change a scientific theory if new facts or information are found, if other scientists' review find errors, if attempts to apply the theory are unsuccessful, or if they see that the calculations are wrong when they double check them, and so then they would retest and rewrite their theory to correct the errors.Science is testing a belief with the means to disprove it and being unable to do so.Scientific Fact = something that has yet to be disproved.
This is my rather informal answer, so take it with a grain of salt: Theories are rejected/ignored when they do not have a good backing or implications that they might be correct, and are conclusively rejected when experimental data disagrees with them. Theories are considered when they seem plausible, and if all experimental data agrees with them, they are accepted.
Just accept his theory.
observe the natural world
if he is smarter than his peers. Albert Einstein would be an example
Some one proves it wrong.