0
What else can I help you with?
What might a scientist do as part of the scientific process?
Observe the natural world - apex 😁
Why might a scientist reject a scientific theory?
there might not be enough proof
Why might a scientist need to repeat a step in scientific method?
So he/she could look at the data again if something goes wrong.
Why might a scientist use simulation in a controlled experiment?
to observe a 1000year process in just one day
Was a scientist's lifestyle a cause or an effect of their brilliance in their field of interest?
Scientists have very different life styles, one from another. There is no single "scientific lifestyle." So how a given scientist lives might be either a cause or effect of that scientist's brilliance - presuming that scientist is brilliant, not all are - or it may have no relation at all to how brilliant a scientist is.
What might a scientist do as part of the scientific process?
Observe the natural world - apex 😁
Why might a scientist reject a scientific theory?
there might not be enough proof
What is a Valid reason why a scientist might reject a scientific theory?
its to old
What is a valid reason a scientist might reject a scientific theory?
It is to old
A scientific paper that has passed through the peer review process is more respected than one that has not. Why might a scientist value a peer-reviewed paper?
The described experiment meets or exceeds the standards of good science.
What might scientist researching the development of personality?
A scientist researching the development of personality is studying Psychology. It is the scientific study of the human mind and its functions, as well as those affecting behavior.
Are scientist and inventors the same thing?
Generally speaking, no. A scientist is someone who studies scientific theories or principles. An inventor is someone who invents things. Some particular scientist might invent something, but the definition of the two words is different.
Why might a scientist need to repeat a step in scientific method?
So he/she could look at the data again if something goes wrong.
What might a scientific do to prove that a theory is true?
A scientist can check their work/lab. Do it again. But their is really no way to say that is is actually true.
Why might a scientist use simulation in a controlled experiment?
to observe a 1000year process in just one day
Was a scientist's lifestyle a cause or an effect of their brilliance in their field of interest?
Scientists have very different life styles, one from another. There is no single "scientific lifestyle." So how a given scientist lives might be either a cause or effect of that scientist's brilliance - presuming that scientist is brilliant, not all are - or it may have no relation at all to how brilliant a scientist is.
Which of these might a scientist do as part of the scientific process?
Observe the natural world, make a hypothesis, experiment, record data, make a conclusion, and repeat. Be careful this differs in almost every text in some way, even if it is insignificant.
