The scientific community rejected Joletta's theory primarily due to a lack of empirical evidence and reproducibility. Critics pointed out that the methodology used in her experiments was flawed, leading to results that could not be reliably replicated by other researchers. Additionally, her conclusions did not align with established scientific principles, making it difficult for her theory to gain acceptance. Overall, the combination of insufficient data and methodological issues undermined her credibility in the field.
A scientific theory is developed through a systematic process that begins with observations and hypotheses. Researchers conduct experiments and gather data to test these hypotheses, ensuring that their findings are reproducible and reliable. Over time, as evidence accumulates and withstands scrutiny, a hypothesis may evolve into a theory that offers a comprehensive explanation of a phenomenon. Peer review and ongoing experimentation further refine and validate the theory within the scientific community.
that thars not enuph proph
The operation of the periscope requires nothing more than the simple geometry of reflection from a plane mirror ... a theory that is well supported by observation and experiment. Its use requires no scientific theory.
Wegener's ideas of continental drift were not immediately accepted by the scientific community because he did not have a satisfactory explanation for the mechanism that could move continents. Additionally, his hypothesis was contrary to the prevailing scientific beliefs at the time, which focused on fixed continents and seafloor spreading. It wasn't until the development of the theory of plate tectonics in the 1960s that Wegener's ideas gained wider acceptance.
Many geologists and scientists at the time made fun of Alfred Wegener's Drift Theory, dismissing it as implausible and unscientific. Wegener's theory of continental drift proposed that the continents were once connected and drifted apart over time, which was not widely accepted until much later when the theory of plate tectonics was formulated.
its to old
It is to old
there might not be enough proof
A scientist might reject a scientific theory if new empirical evidence contradicts its predictions or underlying principles. For instance, if experimental results consistently show outcomes that the theory cannot explain or predict accurately, this would undermine its validity. Additionally, if a theory fails to account for a significant body of existing data or if a more comprehensive alternative theory emerges, a scientist may deem it necessary to reject the original theory.
how well existing scientific data are explained by the new theory.
Scientists may reject a theory if new evidence contradicts it, if it fails to make accurate predictions, or if a better theory emerges that explains the data more effectively. Rejection of a theory is a normal part of the scientific process as it leads to the refinement and advancement of knowledge.
Alfred Wegener was the proponent of the Continental Drift Theory. The scientific community accepted this theory due to the phenomena of paleomagnetism, sea floor spreading and plate tectonics.
constant
a scientific theory is a description of an observed phenomenon while a scientific theory is an explanation of an observed phenomenon
A scientific theory become a law when it is widely recognized and accepted by the scientific community in the epoch.
The theory that is widely accepted as true in the scientific community is known as the scientific theory. This type of theory is based on empirical evidence, experimentation, and observation, and has withstood rigorous testing and scrutiny.
after it has been evaluated and tested repeatedly