Rome had a relatively easy time in conquering Italy because of its more or less centralized location an its superior army. But the conquest of Italy was no cakewalk for Rome. They had to fight the Social Wars and the Samnites were constantly at odds with the Romans up until the time of Sulla.
Rome had a relatively easy time in conquering Italy because of its more or less centralized location an its superior army. But the conquest of Italy was no cakewalk for Rome. They had to fight the Social Wars and the Samnites were constantly at odds with the Romans up until the time of Sulla.
Rome had a relatively easy time in conquering Italy because of its more or less centralized location an its superior army. But the conquest of Italy was no cakewalk for Rome. They had to fight the Social Wars and the Samnites were constantly at odds with the Romans up until the time of Sulla.
Rome had a relatively easy time in conquering Italy because of its more or less centralized location an its superior army. But the conquest of Italy was no cakewalk for Rome. They had to fight the Social Wars and the Samnites were constantly at odds with the Romans up until the time of Sulla.
Rome had a relatively easy time in conquering Italy because of its more or less centralized location an its superior army. But the conquest of Italy was no cakewalk for Rome. They had to fight the Social Wars and the Samnites were constantly at odds with the Romans up until the time of Sulla.
Rome had a relatively easy time in conquering Italy because of its more or less centralized location an its superior army. But the conquest of Italy was no cakewalk for Rome. They had to fight the Social Wars and the Samnites were constantly at odds with the Romans up until the time of Sulla.
Rome had a relatively easy time in conquering Italy because of its more or less centralized location an its superior army. But the conquest of Italy was no cakewalk for Rome. They had to fight the Social Wars and the Samnites were constantly at odds with the Romans up until the time of Sulla.
Rome had a relatively easy time in conquering Italy because of its more or less centralized location an its superior army. But the conquest of Italy was no cakewalk for Rome. They had to fight the Social Wars and the Samnites were constantly at odds with the Romans up until the time of Sulla.
Rome had a relatively easy time in conquering Italy because of its more or less centralized location an its superior army. But the conquest of Italy was no cakewalk for Rome. They had to fight the Social Wars and the Samnites were constantly at odds with the Romans up until the time of Sulla.
I think you are confused. Rome is in Italy. They didn't conquer themselves.
Rome is the capital city of Italy and Rome didn't conquer Italy. It created it. Farming continued and today there is still farming.
Rome had control of Italy before it clashed with Cartage in Sicily, previously its ally.
Rome did not have a military strategy to conquer Italy because she did not have a plan to conquer Italy. Her expansion into Italy was the result of winning several separate wars, sometimes quite apart in history, which were fought for different reasons.
No. Rome's dominance of Italy came nearly a thousand years after Aeneas' reputed death.
Hannibal did not conquer Rome. He invaded Italy with the intention of seizing Rome. After some victories in northern and central Italy he moved to southern Italy instead of marching on Rome. He conducted the rest of his campaign, which eventually failed, in southern Italy. The Romans retook most of his gains in that area and neutralised his threat. He spent the last four years stuck in the easily defensible mountainous toe of Italy (today's Calabria). He was eventually recalled to Carthage because the Romans had started a military campaign in her homeland in Africa.
The "barbarians" never reached all of Italy. They only conquered just north of Italy, where Switzerland is located. They did try to conquer Italy, but failed. They failed because of where Rome is located, and of Italy's unique geography.
Alexander the great did not conquer Rome or ancient Rome.
Rome is the capital of Italy, therefore Rome is in Italy.
He didn't. He attacked Western Rome in 451 AD but was beaten in Gaul (France) by Western Forces under Flavius Aetius. A few years later he invaded Italy while Rome was still recovering but again was forced to retreat due to disease. He died soon after and was never able to conquer Rome. Hope this is helpful.
The Colosseum is in Rome, Italy.
Rome would unify all of Italy's many communities under its rule and ebentually conquer Greece itself.