0
Want this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
A battle over extending slavery finally results in two new states and an agreement on how to handle slavery in the territories?
Missouri Compromise
Why did the south want to expand slavery to the north?
The south was based off of farming. They had a small scale of land and a low population. They wanted to reach new territories to help promote slavery and farming.
In response to the Wilmot Proviso John C Calhoun introduced legislation that would do what?
new territories/states were prevented from banning slavery
How did the increasing regionalization of the nation create difficulties for the national government?
The national government wasn't sure whether to make the new territories "slavery-free" states or slave states.
What was the causes of the Compromise of 1850?
The acquisition of vast new territories from Mexico. The South wanted to spread slavery into these new territories. But it was getting harder to create new slave-states, and Congress had to make a big gesture of appeasement to the South in the form of the Fugitive Slave Act.
The Confederacy wanted to abolish slavery?
The Confederacy did not want to abolish slavery. In fact, they wanted to expand slavery into the new territories of the US.
What was slavery conflict about?
The conflict over slavery in the United States was primarily about the moral and economic implications of treating humans as property. It also centered around the balance of power between free states and slave states, as well as the debate over whether slavery should be allowed to expand into new territories.
Why did David Wilmot wanted slavery prohibited in territories acquired from which country?
David Wilmot wanted slavery prohibited in territories acquired from Mexico in order to prevent the spread of slavery into new territories, as he believed that allowing slavery to expand would only further entrench the institution in the United States. This proposal, known as the Wilmot Proviso, aimed to preserve the western territories for free labor and was part of the broader political debates surrounding the expansion of slavery in the mid-19th century.
What was northern white abolitionist's view on slavery?
Generally speaking, Northerners and Northern politicians believed that slavery should not be allowed to expand to new territories or new states. Part of their argument was negated in 1857 by a ruling by the US Supreme Court which said slavery was constitutional.
Was slavery prohibited in territories of the US?
Slavery was abolished in the United States territories in June 1862. Any new territory was not to have possession of any slaves after this date.
What was the purpose of the Missouri Compromise?
To end an argument about slavery in the territories (apex)
What territories did the Kansas-Nebraska Act open to slavery?
potentially all the new states in the west
What territories did the kansas- Nebraska act open to slavery?
potentially all the new states in the west
A battle over extending slavery finally results in two new states and an agreement on how to handle slavery in the territories?
Missouri Compromise
Who said no slavery in new territories?
The Republican Party and the Quakers were the leading opponents of expanding slavery into the new territories.
What are the reasons the South wanted to expand west?
The UNITED STATES wanted to expand west, and by virtue of the Mexican War did in fact extend from 'sea to shining sea' - however, the South wanted to make sure that the states carved out of the new territories would contain sufficient slave states to maintain deadlock in the Senate over the issue of slavery.
What was the goal of the free-soil party?
to prevent the spread of slavery westward as new territories became states.
