A Mexican cavalry unit crossed the Rio Grande and ambushed an American patrol, killing or wounding 16 American soldiers. Two days later, Congress declared war, and the War with Mexico began. Not everyone favored war. Some people felt that the conflict was unjust and did not see the need to declare war.
Not really sure which war with Mexico you're talking about, I'm going to go ahead and assume you mean the 1846-48 Mexican-American War.
Basically, a lot of people in the North and in the Whig Party (which would later become the core of the then-new Republican Party) felt that the war was an attempt by the South and Democrats to conquer ill-gotten land in the hopes of expanding slavery (which Whigs/Republicans strongly opposed). Some Southerners even expressly stated that they hoped that slavery would indeed spread to newly conquered territory in Mexico.
Because the war was promoted by pro-slave interests; the lands acquired from Mexico would be a flagrant attempt on expanding slave territory. This conflict with Mexico actually planted the seeds for the American Civil War (1861-1865)
They grown to oppose the war because there was a great deal of suffering involved and they were worried about slavery.
It had all the makings of a War of Conquest.
The casualty count as a result of Yellow Fever was unacceptable.
Some members of Congress felt that President Polk's declaration of war on Mexico had been spurred by American tactics that were too aggressive. Some felt that the war's real goal was to acquire more slave territory.
Americans believed that the Mexicans started the War because they "Shed American blood, on American Soil"- President James Polk....but really American troops crossed the border were on Mexico's territory.
No. Not really. The Alamo was a battle in the War for Texas independance from Mexico. You could say that it was a civil war because some Texans who favored independance were fighting against people of Mexican descent who did not want to separate from Mexico.
I'm puzzled by the question. German women did not 'oppose World War 1'.
Because it was destined to increase and support the establishment of slave states and to upset the delicate balance of power established in the Compromise of 1850. It opened a new discourse on slavery that could only be resolved by Civil War.
It would cause war with Mexico and enhance slave power.
Oppose, wars are a bad thing, why would you support it
because back in te days people couldn't survive
Some members of Congress felt that President Polk's declaration of war on Mexico had been spurred by American tactics that were too aggressive. Some felt that the war's real goal was to acquire more slave territory.
Didn't like the way Lincoln was running it. Some of these people were called copperheads.
3
They felt it simply wasn't their war to get into because the war was in Europe
More southern lands only assured the long term continuation of slavery.
derek steller smells
Some were in opposition only as new territories might become slave states and a few because it would be a match up between a professional light heavyweight and a promisng amateur fly weight.
the whigs did not want conquered territory to become slave states
They mirrored the US; protests, etc.