Want this question answered?
They appointed provincial Persian governors who oversaw the local governments and provided internal and external security forces.
Kings
King of Kings.
Kings of Ancient Mesopotamia were kings until they died and then gave the throne to his oldest son. When this keeps on getting passed down they call that a dynasty.
no,as it is in praise of kings so it tell the good qualities of the kings but will not tell the negative points about the kings.
Explorations were very expensive with no guarantee of finding trade routes or bringing back gold or other valuable cargo.
Some governments and kings had difficulty agreeing to fund explorations because of the high costs involved, the risks associated with uncertain outcomes, and concerns about potential failures leading to wasted resources. Additionally, competing priorities for resources such as investing in military, infrastructure, or internal stability could make it challenging to prioritize funding for exploration.
Explorations were very expensive with no guarantee of finding trade routes or bringing back gold or other valuable cargo.
They Sapported Explorations Beacause They Wanted Goods.
Plato
Aristotle
Aristotle
They all had Kings and Pharaohs
The Mayan government was hierarchical. The rulers were kings and priests. The civilization was made up of various city-states with local governments.
The Kings helped facilitate the forming of countries by uniting small feudal states into large kingdoms. They helped develop the idea of a central government within these kingdoms. This government was stronger than the small state governments etc
The king ruled all and there were many priest and sub governments as mini kings in each village.
The way Athens democracy was limited because they had different governments and their kings were big shots