because he quarreled with the king and the barons laughed at the Irish lost land in France made people pay huge taxes so he could pay for war in France
HE became king
It really depends, as lots of historians disagree about the matter. There were some good aspects about him, some bad. The only thing thing that historians can agree on is the fact that there were a lot of problems already made for him when he became King. He is known to have argued with the Pope, and lots of people at the time, including Monks, who were the main writers at the time, thought that he had to be evil because the pope was meant to be the holiest man on earth. In fact, John's father, King Henry II, had done the same thing, but only with a better result as the Pope at that time was less strong minded. In some ways King John was a good king because he fed over 1000 paupers every year. He cared for Jews and committed them into care. But in some ways king John was a bad king because historians say he starved people and crushed old men under lead blocks. ouch. By the way, all of this is true because I'm doing King John at school. king John was a very bad king as he killed his own nephew for the thrown, he lost many battles against England's rivalry countries and he was forced to sign the magna carta. However he has won battles against England ,wales and Scotland and he made England wealthy. He also cared for poor people. King John was a bad king and a bad person but he did care for people.
There was no king as such, because the people of Kalinga loved freedom and did not want any ruler on their head, though some historians called 'Nandidevi' their king who was either Buddist or a Vadic ruler. Yes, the king's name was "Nandidevi." He was the ruler of Kalinga when Ashoka attacked it. It is also declared by many historians, even though this point faces a little opposition from other historians and people. The king was SRUTAYUSH. Nandidevi was his military leader. He was a young king of about 10-20 years of age. He became the king after the death of his father, who was the king of Kalinga earlier.
The Tudors liked King John, this was the time when King Henry the 8th ruled. Henry did alot of things John did, lke quarrelling with the pope and chasing after women! The Tudors had sympathy for King John when he lost France because King Hnery had problems with the French. Also Tudors admired John for standing up to his Barons because Tudors did not expect Barons to interfere with anything. Hope this was helpful xx
he killed him-self and their was no king :)
King John murdered his brother king William.
The monks wrote bad things about John,some even false because King John didnt like the pope and the pope didnt like him.
King James children were John, peter, Eliza but i think he had some more children i am not sure.
Because he was king at the time and he thought that he should of had some say in what happened because it was his country and he was king so he thought he was ruler of what everyone done.
- King John took over some French towns and states so the French fought and succeeded so they got them back - King John upset an important French baron family by wanting to marry Isabella, the families' 12 year old daughter. - King John joined a force against his father and he came less and less popular as King.
king John to some was great and to others not so great. King John did make horrible mistakes in the past such as: Leaving the country a mess when he was off the throne.A good thing about King John is that he fed 1000 paupers every year. He made England richer by introducing new money systems to England.I hope this much information helps you.Written bySurrayia
If legend says that king Narmer united upper and lower Egypt some historians think Narmer actually represents several kings....