answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

It was thought that alcohol was destroying families and the fabric of American society. It was thought that denying people alcohol would stop them from craving it and lessen crime. Funny how that turned out.

User Avatar

Wiki User

9y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Why did some people argue that Prohibition was a necessary war measure?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Why did people argue that Prohibition was a necessary war measure?

It was thought that alcohol was destroying families and the fabric of American society. It was thought that denying people alcohol would stop them from craving it and lessen crime. Funny how that turned out.


What did the wets argue for during the prohibition?

legalization of bootlegging


Why election not necessary?

It is not necessary because the people just argue about something that is simple they should just stop arguing and work together!


What did the 'drys' argue were the benefits of prohibition?

it improved individuals, strengthand families, and created better societies


What happened after prohibition was enforced?

The demand for alcohol was met by black marketeers and the prohibition of alcohol empowered criminals, further empowered a federal government and gave rise to lawlessness. As an Amendment listed in the Bill of Rights the prohibition of alcohol is a strange right to be enumerated. I would not argue that we don't have the right to not drink alcohol. I would argue that people do have the right to drink alcohol if they so choose. Prohibition of products or resources that have clear demand in a market place never work and the current laws in the United States prohibiting certain drugs gives evidence to the failures of prohibition. Unless of course, the intent behind prohibition is to empower the petty tyrants who wish to rule. Then prohibition can be a very effective tool in grabbing power.


Did Jefferson argue with the necessary addition to the constitution and why?

Yes, Jefferson argued with the necessary addition to the constitution. This is because he felt he had to protect the people from the abuses of power and government.


What is the difference in use between 'inhibition' and 'prohibition'?

'Inhibition' refers to a mental or psychological restraint, while 'prohibition' typically refers to a formal law or rule that forbids something. 'Inhibition' can be self-imposed, whereas 'prohibition' is generally imposed by an external authority.


What are facts that argue that Prohibition failed?

It failed to reduce the problem of alcohol abuse and it created numerous serious problems for individuals and society.


The main purpose of the Declaration of Independence was to?

2


Why does your boyfriend argue with you then with the people who cause us problems?

There are two interpretations of your question: 1. Why does my boyfriend argue with me first and then argue with the people who cause us problems? 2. Why does my boyfriend argue with me rather than with the people who cause us problems? Which is it?


What is the noun form of argue?

Argument. People who "argue" can be said to be having an "argument".


Which constitutional idea did Alexander Hamilton use to argue for the ability to collect taxes?

Necessary and proper