answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Because he leaned towards a view of war being necessary, and the american people just wanted peace and isolationism for the most part.

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

10y ago

He was in favor of using atomic bombs/ hydrogen bombs against North Vietnam.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Why did some people find Barry Goldwater views threatening?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Lost the 1964 presidential election in a landslide because his views were seen as too extreme?

Barry Goldwater, the Republican candidate, lost the 1964 presidential election in a landslide to Lyndon B. Johnson, the Democratic candidate. Goldwater's conservative views, particularly on issues such as civil rights and nuclear weapons, were seen as too extreme by many voters, contributing to his overwhelming defeat.


Who is barry goldwater?

Barry Goldwater was a US Senator for Arizona, and a supporter of the Republican supporter. He was one of the most influential members who took the Republican party in a more right-wing direction, often campaigning against welfare programs and the Soviet Union. His most famous quote is "Extremism in defence of liberty is no vice" and this has been seen recently amid Libertarian protests against the Obama administration. Goldwater campaigned for President in 1964 but his far-right views alienated large numbers of moderate Republicans. Furthermore, it had only been a year since the assassination of John F Kennedy and most people were prepared to keep Lyndon B Johnson as President. Johnson's campaign portrayed Goldwater as insane and liable to cause a nuclear war, and it worked; the Democrats won by a landslide. Goldwater lost his Senate seat in the election, but returned in 1969 and remained in the Senate until the 1960s, when he retired and was replace by John McCain.


Would Barry Goldwater have despised Barack Obama?

I doubt it. It's always hard to say what a person from the past would think of a person from the present, but based on Goldwater's beliefs, as well as interviews he gave, we could safely say the two men would have been political adversaries. Senator Goldwater would have disagreed with President Obama on a number of issues, especially since during the early part of his career, Mr. Goldwater was a very conservative Republican, while Mr. Obama was more of a centrist Democrat. But in the latter part of his career, Mr. Goldwater became more of a libertarian, and there are actually some issues on which the two men would have agreed. There is no evidence, contrary to what you might hear on political talk shows, that Mr. Goldwater would have "despised" anyone, including Barack Obama. In fact, Goldwater, was at one time considered extreme by not just Democrats but by many in his own Republican party; today, his views would place him somewhere in the moderate part of the spectrum.


How can I get more views for this video?

To get more views, tell your friends, family, and any other people and tell them to tell other people to get more views.


What are the views and values of Islamic people?

views and values of turkish poeple


What are the views of art?

people


What are people's views about recycling?

no


What are kits political views?

kits political views are that people should be loyalists.


Should elections be banned?

No. Then the people would have no say on those that rule them in their countries. There would not be anyone to represent the views of the people. It is important for people to have their say and for their views to be known in running a country, or whatever position the election is for.No. Then the people would have no say on those that rule them in their countries. There would not be anyone to represent the views of the people. It is important for people to have their say and for their views to be known in running a country, or whatever position the election is for.No. Then the people would have no say on those that rule them in their countries. There would not be anyone to represent the views of the people. It is important for people to have their say and for their views to be known in running a country, or whatever position the election is for.No. Then the people would have no say on those that rule them in their countries. There would not be anyone to represent the views of the people. It is important for people to have their say and for their views to be known in running a country, or whatever position the election is for.No. Then the people would have no say on those that rule them in their countries. There would not be anyone to represent the views of the people. It is important for people to have their say and for their views to be known in running a country, or whatever position the election is for.No. Then the people would have no say on those that rule them in their countries. There would not be anyone to represent the views of the people. It is important for people to have their say and for their views to be known in running a country, or whatever position the election is for.No. Then the people would have no say on those that rule them in their countries. There would not be anyone to represent the views of the people. It is important for people to have their say and for their views to be known in running a country, or whatever position the election is for.No. Then the people would have no say on those that rule them in their countries. There would not be anyone to represent the views of the people. It is important for people to have their say and for their views to be known in running a country, or whatever position the election is for.No. Then the people would have no say on those that rule them in their countries. There would not be anyone to represent the views of the people. It is important for people to have their say and for their views to be known in running a country, or whatever position the election is for.No. Then the people would have no say on those that rule them in their countries. There would not be anyone to represent the views of the people. It is important for people to have their say and for their views to be known in running a country, or whatever position the election is for.No. Then the people would have no say on those that rule them in their countries. There would not be anyone to represent the views of the people. It is important for people to have their say and for their views to be known in running a country, or whatever position the election is for.


What are the advantages and disadvantages of role play?

Role play is an exercise where people take on assumed roles to understand other views. Advantages of the practice include it is fun, time efficient, and lets everyone participate and contribute. Disadvantages include participants being too shy to participate and can be threatening to some people.


What are the religious views in rajasthan?

people of rajastan are mostly hindus, so they have Hindu views or religion


Do UN delegates represent the views of their government or their people?

UN delegates represent the views of their government.