The most common objection was that it was victors' justice.
The Nuremberg Trials.
Some people believe the Nuremberg Trials were unjust because they were seen as victor's justice, with the Allied powers acting as judges and prosecutors. Additionally, some argue that the trials did not provide a fair legal process for the accused, as they were held under ex post facto laws. Lastly, there were criticisms that the trials did not hold individuals from the Allied powers accountable for their actions during the war.
Hjalmar Schacht, Franz von Papen, Hans Fritzsche, and Franz Halder were some of the prominent figures who were acquitted at the Nuremberg trials.
I wonder if you are thinking of the Nuremberg Trials. Please see related question.
Yes, there was controversy surrounding the Nuremberg Trials, particularly regarding the legality of retroactively applying new laws to prosecute war crimes, the fairness of the trials, and the scope of punishment. Some critics argued that the trials were victor's justice and undermined the defendants' right to a fair trial.
Nobody suggested that the Holocaust was some unplanned accident.
Assuming you meant the Nuremberg Trials, the truth is the allies found a number of Nazis guilty of crimes against humanity. Some were sentenced to life in prison. Some were executed.
They were the Nuremberg War Crimes Trials. ____ There were some other similar trials, for example the 'Bergen-Belsen Tribunal'; there were trials in Poland, Belgium and France, and many other countries.
The obvious alternative was summary execution, a solution which didn't appeal to some of the Allies.
The Nuremberg Trials were the first international trials to hold individuals accountable for committing crimes against humanity, war crimes, and genocide. While criticized for their retroactive application and Western bias, the trials set a precedent for prosecuting state leaders for international crimes and establishing principles of individual criminal responsibility. Overall, the Nuremberg Trials were a landmark in the development of international humanitarian law.
Many argue that justice was served in the Nuremberg and Tokyo war crimes trials as they held individuals accountable for their actions during World War II. These trials set a precedent for international law and established that individuals could be prosecuted for committing atrocities during wartime. However, some critics have raised concerns about the fairness and impartiality of these trials.
death sentence if they were in same court room with the Nazis during Nuremberg trials