answersLogoWhite

0

World War 2
Germany in WW2
Hiroshima and Nagasaki Atomic Bombings

Why did the Japanese treat their prisoners the way they did?


Top Answer
User Avatar
Wiki User
Answered 2004-10-10 16:13:15

The Japanese soldiers had Bushido Kodeks which said that a soldier should rather die then give up. For them a POW had no honor.

001
๐Ÿ™
0
๐Ÿคจ
0
๐Ÿ˜ฎ
0
๐Ÿ˜‚
0
User Avatar

Your Answer

Loading...

Still have questions?

Related Questions

How did Japanese treat prisoners of war in World War 2?

They treated the US soldiers terribly.


How did the Geneva Convention treat prisoners of Japanese war?

The terms of the Geneva Convention were ignored by the Japanese who made up rules and inflicted punishments at the whim of the Camp Commandant. There were more than 140,000 white prisoners in Japanese prisoner of war camps. Of these, one in three died from starvation, work and punishments or from diseases for which there were no medicines to treat.


How did the Japanese treat conquered people?

As taught by the warrior code of the Japanese (Bushido), they treated conquered peoples as slaves, and prisoners were often abused or killed.


What was the impact of the Andersonville Prison?

The prison was a horrible way to treat Confederate prisoners.


How did the Australians treat Japanese prisoners in World War 2?

The Australians treated the Japanese well in POW camps and gave them better food and water than the Japanese gave them, better shelter, medical attention, clothing and cigarettes.


Were Japanese prisoners of the World War 2 mistreated in Australia?

They were treated in accordance with the Geneva Convention. Australian prisoners of the Japanese were not.


What has the author Dorothy Still Danner written?

Dorothy Still Danner has written: 'What a way to spend a war' -- subject(s): American Personal narratives, Biography, Japanese Prisoners and prisons, Nurses, Personal narratives, American, Prisoners and prisons, Japanese, Prisoners of war, World War, 1939-1945


How did Lord Akiyama treat his prisoners in the samurai's tale?

Lord Akiyama did not treat his prisoners very well. He fed them and things but didn't love them in that sense


Did the Japanese take any prisoners?

Yes


What has the author W E Johns written?

W. E. Johns has written: 'No surrender' -- subject(s): British Personal narratives, Japanese Prisoners and prisoners, Personal narratives, British, Prisoners and prisoners, Japanese, World War, 1939-1945


How do the Japanese people treat their elders?

japanese people treat thier elders with a to of respect!


When were Japanese prisoners of war released?

When the war ended.


How did the Japanese kill prisoners of war?

Sword and bayonet.


What role did prisoners of war play in Japanese war effort?

Japanese made extensive use of labor forces composed to both prisoners of war and local peoples.


What did the POWs have to do in the camps?

Japanese and most German prisoners remained confined to Allied camps. Many Italian prisoners were allowed out to work on farms in Britain and Australia and in many cases left the camps for the duration of the war. As for Allied prisoners in Axis hands, the Japanese and to a lesser extent the Germans required prisoners to work, in the case of the Japanese, often to death.


How did jack treat his prisoners in lord of the flies?

not good he beats them


What has the author Cornelius van Heekeren written?

Cornelius van Heekeren has written: 'Moord en brand' -- subject(s): Dutch Personal narratives, Japanese Prisoners and prisons, Personal narratives, Dutch, Prisoners and prisons, Japanese, World War, 1939-1945 'Batavia seint' 'Helden, hazen en honden' -- subject(s): Japanese Prisoners and prisons, Prisoners and prisons, Japanese, World War, 1939-1945


Did the Bushido Code prevent Japanese from taking prisoners?

The code of Bushido is directly translated as "the way of the warrior". It was the code which became the standard living protocol for the Japanese soldier. The code itself does not state that prisoners are to be executed immediately. Many Japanese officers and soldiers believed and were told that in order to meet the standards of the warrior, they must not hesitate to kill the enemy. Therefore prisoners were executed to prove that they were worthy of being called warriors. Also the Japanese did not believe in surrender and as such, it was thought that all prisoners were lowly cowards who were too scared to meet their deaths. This was a bit at odds with Western ideas about surrender.


How many Japanese were prisoners during pearl harbor?

1.


How were Australian prisoners treated compared to the prisoners generally treated in Japanese POW camps?

Australian POWs were treated as appallingly as other whites in Japanese camps. They were used as slave labour.


How did the Japanese treat prisoners in World War 2?

Very badly indeed. They were starved, beaten, tortured and executed for no reason. They were made to work until they dropped dead of exhaustion. It was also based on a sense of racial superiority and on the Bushido concept that these prisoners had dishornored themselves by their very act of surrender.


Did the Japanese keep any American prisoners?

yes during the war


Where the British more fair than the Japanese in WW2?

If you base it entirely on the treatment of prisoners of war, the British were much better at treating them fairly and with compassion. The Japanese treatment of prisoners involved torture and starvation.


What has the author Yoshitaka Tsukamoto written?

Yoshitaka Tsukamoto has written: 'Takasago Maru ni naku' -- subject(s): Japanese Personal narratives, Personal narratives, Japanese, Prisoners and prisons, Russian, Prisoners of war, Russian Prisoners and prisons, World War, 1939-1945


Why did the Japanese treat Australian prisoners in World War 2 badly?

The Japanese treated ALL Allied prisoners B A D L Y. The Empire of Japan was not a signatory to the Geneva Convention, therefore they were not bound to treat their prisoners humanely. The Code of Bushito dictated that Japanese Soldiers would never be captured. If they were, that brought shame not only to the man who surrendered, but to his family also. The Japanese applied this Code to Allied Prisoners, military & civilian alike, making them sub-human in the eyes of their captors. Simply put, Allied POWs were loathed by their Japanese captors. Richard V. Horrell WW 2 Connections.com Answer AS RICHARD SAID ABOUT THE CODE OF BUSHITO. ALSO I BELEIVE ACCORDING TO THE SAME CODE,A PRISONER THAT WAS EXECUTED BY BEHEADING WAS CONSIDERED TO HAVE DIED WITH HONOR. HOWEVER WESTERNERS FOUND IT A QUITE APPALLING WAY TO GO.(I AGREE)Further:Apart from the idological approach, which overstates the realities on the ground, there was a practiclal one. The Japanese army need a labour force. The POW were impressed as slaves to build military railways, work in mines, war production. Australian prisoners were used along with other prisoners and inhabitants of the conquered countries as labourers on the Siam-Burma railway construction and in Japan in mining and industry. This had nothing to do with ideology. As a Japanese said 'many men must die' meaning that the work would be unrelentingly severe to achieve the aim of the railway construction - to support the Burma campaign - nothing to do with Bushido.