Want this question answered?
Limits to free speech were constitutional during national emergencies
Legislation
Yes, states decide the laws concerning drinking and the selling of liquor .
they have hearings
The federal government wanted the Native Americans to become farmers.
In their society, the Romans chose not to have a monarchy as their form of government. Kings were taboo to their way of thinking due to the oppressiveness of their last ruling king.
Farmer Cincinnatus was appointed (Decide) dictator because Rome needed to be protected from neighboring Aequi who had surrounded the Roman army and the council minucius, in the Alban Hills.Cincinnatus accepted the offer, defeated Aeqi, and went back to his farming.
Russia is a centralized, anti-democratic government that depends on the prime minister/dictator to decide or implement policies. In this case, Russia relied on Vladimir Putin to make their decisions.
if the consuls could not decide on a matter then the dictator would be chosen and would rule for a short period of time
Limits to free speech were constitutional during national emergencies.
The Romans first used a measuremant called a mile passum.
Limits to free speech were constitutional during national emergencies
They didn't .
The ancient Greeks actually thought of it first and then the Romans developed it a bit further. In the 1700's enlightenment thinkers like John Locke wrote the revolutionary idea that man could decide his government.
Limits to free speech were constitutional during national emergencies - apex
Limits to free speech were constitutional during national emergencies.
That depends on the structure of control of society's resources. In a social democracy (i.e., mob rule), an elected body decides. In a dictatorship, the dictator of someone under him decides.