The Romans did not want a king because they did not want person to be in charge that is why they elected TWO Consuls
They didn't want a leader in a republic government.
Monarchy.
The Roman monachy was not a hostory of 244 years of harsh rule. Only its last king was a tyrant. The Romans overthrew the last Roman king in a rebellion in 509 BC because he was a tyrant. They decided to do away with the monarchy and establish a republic to prevent the return of tyranny. Monarchy became associated with tyranny. They created the Roman Republic, which was headed by two annually elected consuls. Having two men in charge meant that they could counterbalance each other. The short term of office ensured that no one could concentrate power in his hands and thus become a tyrant. The Romans also swore that they would not let anyone try to become a king. Trying to become a king was the worst possible accusation .In the 5th century BC one man was killed and his house destroyed and in the 4th century BC another man was executed because of accusations of trying to become a king.
A revolution and the formation of the republic were the effects of the Romans no longer wanting a monarchy.A revolution and the formation of the republic were the effects of the Romans no longer wanting a monarchy.A revolution and the formation of the republic were the effects of the Romans no longer wanting a monarchy.A revolution and the formation of the republic were the effects of the Romans no longer wanting a monarchy.A revolution and the formation of the republic were the effects of the Romans no longer wanting a monarchy.A revolution and the formation of the republic were the effects of the Romans no longer wanting a monarchy.A revolution and the formation of the republic were the effects of the Romans no longer wanting a monarchy.A revolution and the formation of the republic were the effects of the Romans no longer wanting a monarchy.A revolution and the formation of the republic were the effects of the Romans no longer wanting a monarchy.
the Romans had a lot of problems within there own city so they did away to stop the problems and Cesar took over as king
In their society, the Romans chose not to have a monarchy as their form of government. Kings were taboo to their way of thinking due to the oppressiveness of their last ruling king.
In 510BC the Romans overthrew the monarchy and began the republic.In 510BC the Romans overthrew the monarchy and began the republic.In 510BC the Romans overthrew the monarchy and began the republic.In 510BC the Romans overthrew the monarchy and began the republic.In 510BC the Romans overthrew the monarchy and began the republic.In 510BC the Romans overthrew the monarchy and began the republic.In 510BC the Romans overthrew the monarchy and began the republic.In 510BC the Romans overthrew the monarchy and began the republic.In 510BC the Romans overthrew the monarchy and began the republic.
They were sick and tired of the tyranny of a one man rule.
they didn't its went monarchy government dictatorship.
The Romans strongly opposed a monarchy.
Monarchy.
The ancient Romans did not want to have a king. They overthrew the monarchy and vowed that they would never permit another. This was during the 482 years of the republican period. However, they ended up with 503 years of rule by emperors whose power was even more absolute than that of the kings.
The ancient Romans had three forms of government, the monarchy, the republic and the principate. The monarchy was the absolute rule by a king, the republic was the electing of officials by the people and the principate was the incorporation of the powers of the republic into one person, the emperor.The ancient Romans had three forms of government, the monarchy, the republic and the principate. The monarchy was the absolute rule by a king, the republic was the electing of officials by the people and the principate was the incorporation of the powers of the republic into one person, the emperor.The ancient Romans had three forms of government, the monarchy, the republic and the principate. The monarchy was the absolute rule by a king, the republic was the electing of officials by the people and the principate was the incorporation of the powers of the republic into one person, the emperor.The ancient Romans had three forms of government, the monarchy, the republic and the principate. The monarchy was the absolute rule by a king, the republic was the electing of officials by the people and the principate was the incorporation of the powers of the republic into one person, the emperor.The ancient Romans had three forms of government, the monarchy, the republic and the principate. The monarchy was the absolute rule by a king, the republic was the electing of officials by the people and the principate was the incorporation of the powers of the republic into one person, the emperor.The ancient Romans had three forms of government, the monarchy, the republic and the principate. The monarchy was the absolute rule by a king, the republic was the electing of officials by the people and the principate was the incorporation of the powers of the republic into one person, the emperor.The ancient Romans had three forms of government, the monarchy, the republic and the principate. The monarchy was the absolute rule by a king, the republic was the electing of officials by the people and the principate was the incorporation of the powers of the republic into one person, the emperor.The ancient Romans had three forms of government, the monarchy, the republic and the principate. The monarchy was the absolute rule by a king, the republic was the electing of officials by the people and the principate was the incorporation of the powers of the republic into one person, the emperor.The ancient Romans had three forms of government, the monarchy, the republic and the principate. The monarchy was the absolute rule by a king, the republic was the electing of officials by the people and the principate was the incorporation of the powers of the republic into one person, the emperor.
The Roman monachy was not a hostory of 244 years of harsh rule. Only its last king was a tyrant. The Romans overthrew the last Roman king in a rebellion in 509 BC because he was a tyrant. They decided to do away with the monarchy and establish a republic to prevent the return of tyranny. Monarchy became associated with tyranny. They created the Roman Republic, which was headed by two annually elected consuls. Having two men in charge meant that they could counterbalance each other. The short term of office ensured that no one could concentrate power in his hands and thus become a tyrant. The Romans also swore that they would not let anyone try to become a king. Trying to become a king was the worst possible accusation .In the 5th century BC one man was killed and his house destroyed and in the 4th century BC another man was executed because of accusations of trying to become a king.
In 79 AD the Romans had the principate or in loose terms a monarchy. Titus was the emperor in that year after the death of his father.
The Romans had three forms of government, the monarchy, the republic and the principate.
The ancient Romans had three types of government. They were the monarchy, the republic and the principate.
A revolution and the formation of the republic were the effects of the Romans no longer wanting a monarchy.A revolution and the formation of the republic were the effects of the Romans no longer wanting a monarchy.A revolution and the formation of the republic were the effects of the Romans no longer wanting a monarchy.A revolution and the formation of the republic were the effects of the Romans no longer wanting a monarchy.A revolution and the formation of the republic were the effects of the Romans no longer wanting a monarchy.A revolution and the formation of the republic were the effects of the Romans no longer wanting a monarchy.A revolution and the formation of the republic were the effects of the Romans no longer wanting a monarchy.A revolution and the formation of the republic were the effects of the Romans no longer wanting a monarchy.A revolution and the formation of the republic were the effects of the Romans no longer wanting a monarchy.