Some people would reverse your question. The US stopped trading with the Axis powers in Europe and Asia and gave assistance to the Allies. If Japan suffered more, it was only because their economy was more dependent on the US. Remember that Germany surrendered before nuclear weapons were fully developed. It is arguable that the US would have reacted with more fury towards Germany had it still existed as an independent entity in August 1945 Because of what the Japanese did to Pearl Harbour
The comparative form of "harshly" is "more harshly."
No, "harshly" is an adverb. It describes how an action is done.
Yes, harshly is an adverb.Some example sentences using this word are:The judges harshly criticised his performance.She harshly scolded her child.
The emperor harshly declared that China saw no value in acquiring European goods
why did the spaniards treat the Aztecs harshly
-ly is the suffix for harshly. It means in the matter of and turns it into a adverb.
The word "harsh" is an adjective.
"Don't touch that!" the angry man growled harshly.
No. Hammurabi's code did not extend equal treatment to women and slaves, and crimes perpetrated against nobles were more harshly punished than those against commoners,
No, it is not necessary to speak harshly. Effective communication can be achieved through kindness, understanding, and respect. Speaking harshly can often lead to misunderstandings and strain relationships.
Lots of people say very harshly so they treated them very harshly
they wew treated harshly because people saw them as a threat to socioty