Want this question answered?
The fighting in the South was less vicious.
The British under Banastre Tarleton reportedly committed an atrocity by killing colonial soldiers who had surrendered at the Battle of Waxhaws in South Carolina, it was referred to as the Waxhaws Massacre.
The fighting was more vicious than on any other front other than in the Pacific .
because the war was vicious
The hammer thing, or if you get Entei out of a Pokeball =P
Fighting in the South during the American Revolution was especially vicious because of the large concentration of Loyalists there. They aligned with the Cherokee Indians who hated the Patriots for encroaching on their land. They were known for their savage fighting and brutality.
The fighting in the South was less vicious.
The fighting in the South was less vicious.
The fighting in the South was less vicious.
Some of the most vicious and close-quarters combat characterized the fighting in the Pacific Theater of Operations and was equal to the ferocity to be found on the Eastern Front between the Germans and Russians .
The British under Banastre Tarleton reportedly committed an atrocity by killing colonial soldiers who had surrendered at the Battle of Waxhaws in South Carolina, it was referred to as the Waxhaws Massacre.
Boxing, wrestling, javelin throwing, and the most vicious, the pankration - 'all power' was a no hold barred fight.
Vicious could be a good thing, given the nature of the category, but it generally means really mean or animalistic. In other words, it doesn't sound like love, but more of a fetish.
The word vicious is an adjective, a word that describes a noun as deliberately cruel or violent:a vicious attack, vicious gossip, a vicious criminal, etc.
"Vicious" doesn't have a comparative and superlative form. Instead, you would say "more vicious" or "most vicious."
There is no noun for the word "vicious". "Vicious" is an adjective.
The fighting was more vicious than on any other front other than in the Pacific .