Because for those owning slaves having a cheap work force can be quite appealing.
Popular Sovereignty
freeport doctrine
Because the war was not about slavery - until Lincoln decided to turn it into a moral crusade, in order to keep the British from helping the Confederates. If most Northerners had been against slavery, there would not have had to be a dedicated 'Abolitionist lobby'.
Yes she is people she just decided to keep a seceret.
He did at first, hoping to keep the Union together and to preserve the peace. After a few years of war, he decided to use the war to keep the nation together and end slavery once and for all in the USA.
Pro-slavery and anti-slavery forces fought for control of the territory because it had not yet been decided if Kansas would become a free or slave state.
you don't get paid and its cruel to keep people in captivity
Their both impossible to stop. People are going to keep doing it forever. Slavery has stopped in the us, but in Africia there is still slavery. Thanks for asking.
He kept the Union together. He did end slavery, but to keep the union together.
They were kept there by threat of death.
The issue of slavery in the territory ceded by Mexico was decided by the Compromise of 1850, which allowed residents to determine whether to allow slavery through popular sovereignty. This meant that the territories of New Mexico and California could decide on the slavery issue for themselves when applying for statehood.
utah and mexico