Well, let's think about this for a minute and you'll see how everything is connected on our planet.
Wolves are predators. They eat things like mice and rats, rabbits, deer and even other smaller predators like coyotes and snakes.
If you take the predators out of a system, the prey animals overpopulate because nothing is eating them. They eat all the food in the area and then they starve and the other herbivores starve because they don't have any food either. The animals are also less healthy because the wolves killed off the sickly and weak animals and left the stronger ones alive to reproduce.
With the plants all eaten in that area, the land has nothing to hold it in place and erosion really starts wearing it away and even causing floods and mudslides if it's bad enough.
On a human perspective, now you've got all those pest animals like rats and rabbits and deer overpopulating and moving into human areas. They eat our gardens and food crops, they ruin things by chewing on them or pooping in them, and they carry diseases that we can catch. Humans aren't very good at being predators either - hunters don't want the sick and weak animals so they kill off the strongest ones and leave the weak ones to reproduce, which ends up with a sickly population of animals.
It would have been nice if people had left the larger predators in place and just stayed out of their territories so they could have controlled the ecosystem the way they're supposed to do.
It changed the balance of many different interactions - APEX
All parts of an ecosystem interact so the removal of any one part can have wide reaching consequences. when wolves were removed from Yellowstone they were no longer able to hunt the elk which enabled herd numbers to rise. The rise in the number of elk lowered the good grazing land which affected the other animals who graze.
yes. they serve the function of "predators" in most ecosystems in which they exist.
The fish shares a niche with another species
well,you have to think about how if wolves dont eat a certain organism,that organism can over populate and harm even were organism.
It changed the balance of many different interactions - APEX
Wolves are the top predators. When you remove them you upset the balance of the ecosystem. Wolves serve a fital part in the ecosystem. They control the population of their prey. Without control the population would grow too large.
All parts of an ecosystem interact so the removal of any one part can have wide reaching consequences. when wolves were removed from Yellowstone they were no longer able to hunt the elk which enabled herd numbers to rise. The rise in the number of elk lowered the good grazing land which affected the other animals who graze.
wolves live in a hot and cold ecosystem
The ecosystem has a complicated series of interactions.
yes. they serve the function of "predators" in most ecosystems in which they exist.
There will be no more wolves and the ecosystem will collapse some.
NO... Unless someone ships a whole bunch of wolves there, but that would ruin the ecosystem
yes
Forests
The fish shares a niche with another species
Better in or at or with what?Well, pandas are cuter, but wolves are a vital part of the ecosystem.