Want this question answered?
They did not want the power within the federal government to be controlled by just one person or group.
you may want to change that to are the government bad people , and no.
a change from the government
Hobbes wanted a strong government monarchy.
Both parties want a central government that defends the interests of the one percent.
I can see your new around here (; im bringing sexy back
What Is The Third Estate? Everything What Has It Been Until Now In The Political Order? Nothing What Does It Want To Be? Something -from "What is the Third Estate?" by Abbe Sieyes, 1789
By making the First estate and the Second estate pay taxes and thus contribute to France's budget.
The Third Estate had many more members than the other two combined, and represented many, many more people. Its dlegates wanted to vote by head (one delegate, one vote) rather than by Estate (one Estate, one vote). That way, the majority would have a majority
In an unlimited government, the leaders can do whatever they want
In an unlimited government, the leaders can do whatever they want
The traditional status of the third estate was that they were middle-upper middle class and above but not nobles also known as bourgeoisie. They did not get the same number of votes as the first and second estate and was not treated as well. Sieyes wants to change the traditional status of the third estate by advocating the abandonment of the traditional functioning of the three Estates as separate parties and the combine them into a single chamber; National Assembly.
The three estates had an equal vote in the Estates General, which gave the first estate (clergy) and the second estate (nobility) both equal presence with the third estate. This was problematic for two reasons. The first issue was that these votes were vastly out of proportion with the amount of people that they represented. The third estate was 97-98% of the French population, but had only 33% of the vote. The second issue was that the equal votes of the first and second estate served as an effective veto to oppose any changes or improvements which the third estate would request, effectively making the third estate unable to use the Estates General as a vehicle to benefit them in any way.
The system was that each estate took its own poll on a one-man-one-vote basis; the majority in each estate decided how that Estate should vote; and the final voting was by Estates. On tax questions, the Third Estate was bound to be outnumbered two to one, despiteits memebrs being far more numerous than those of the other two. Naturally, threfore, they wanted a single one-man-one-vote arrangement.
There are many different top school that you offers you online degrees but if you want to go into real estate then Marylhurst University is the right for you to get your BS in Real Estate Studies.
You mean a contract to sell a property in which the parent has a life estate? No. If the children want to sell their future interest in the property, it is separate from the rights of the parent with a life estate. Similarly, the children do not need to be asked if the the parent wants to sell (or mortgage) his or her life estate to someone else. On the other hand, if the buyers want clear title, with no life estate, then you have a different problem: terminating the life estate, by merging it with the future estate, and what's in it for you?
A realtor can recommend the best areas to look in for real estate in Melbourne in your price range. Visit different realtors until you find one you are comfortable with and is not pushy or trying to make you spend more than you want to for what you want.