Want this question answered?
No. They stayed at home helping on the home front.
Women changed because woman began to enter into professions previously dominated by men.
in the civil war some women where army nurses while some where spices and some take care of the home and are even in the war front.
a variety of roles, some through enlistment in confederate or union forces (generally as cooks or nurses), some less direct roles, such as keeping home and business under control while men had left, and some (through their own ambition) became spies. All of the above (APEX)
A mixture of loyality to their home country, fear from propaganda of the allied invading troops - that saw civilian women and children jump to the deaths from cliffs rather than be captured and sense of duty I reckon.
They did not serve in the military, on either side. But their whole war was a constant fight to keep family life going at home.
Home is a reason to fight for and come home to.
Women typically were home makers before and after the American Civil War.
Yes, home fronts always play an important part in any war. Women worked hard to support their husbands in the civil war. Some disguised themselves as men such as Carla Barton in order to fight in the war.
No. They stayed at home helping on the home front.
If working in war, they were allowed to sew uniforms and work as a nurse. If working at home, they would care for there children and work for the family.
Lincolin
Civil War. He was a general for the Confederate Army. Although he was against slavery and agreed with the unions ideas, he couldn't bear to not fight for his home, VA, let alone fight against it.
Women changed because woman began to enter into professions previously dominated by men.
Sri Lanka. They really belong in India.
in the civil war some women where army nurses while some where spices and some take care of the home and are even in the war front.
Women were left to stand the home front while the men went off to fight in WWII.