Want this question answered?
neither side could decisively beat the other
The technological innovations led to the trench stalemate on the western front in various ways. Each army developed entrenchments which they intended to use in the war and this is what propagated the Trench Warfare.
The first large battle of the US Civil War was fought
In trenches.
Stalemate is a perfect description for the lack of movement on the Western Front. Both sides hit an impasse - both dug and created huge networks of trenches and spent years trying to gain small amounts of ground. Neither side was able to gain much ground in the war. They would send troops to capture the other side's trenches and then have to abandon them almost immediatly when a counter offensive was launched.
Trenches were designed to offer maximum defensive cover. It is this attribute caused the stalemate of the war on the Western Front.
neither side could decisively beat the other
They were the western front. But the different trenches were front line trenches, communication trenches.
yes
The Western Front is generally considered a stalemate because of Trench Warfare. The line separating Allied Territory and Entente territory did not move much at all during the whole war. This is because both sides stayed in their trenches and if they advanced, they were pushed back quickly
ugh
The Western Front!
The Western Front had reached a stalemate and the British generals wanted a decisive victory. Gallipoli was a side-track and a failure.
beacuse Winter Had Approached
On the western front, along France's eastern border (it was called the western front because it was on the west of Germany.
trenches and sieges on cities
The technological innovations led to the trench stalemate on the western front in various ways. Each army developed entrenchments which they intended to use in the war and this is what propagated the Trench Warfare.