Bal Gangadhar Tilak
Yes, the British East India Company lost its position as the ruler of India after the Indian Rebellion of 1857. Following the uprising, the British government dissolved the Company in 1874 and took direct control of India, establishing the British Raj. This marked the beginning of a new era of direct British rule over the Indian subcontinent.
In 1857, Meerut was under British control as part of British India. The local ruler, or the chief authority before the uprising, was a British officer, Lieutenant Colonel George M. Anson, who commanded the 60th Native Infantry. The rebellion, known as the Indian Rebellion of 1857, began in Meerut when Indian soldiers (sepoys) revolted against British rule, marking a significant turning point in India's struggle for independence.
British ruler, japan ruler, German ruler
samudra gupt
France invaded Mexico and set up Maximilian I as the new ruler for the so-called Second Mexican Empire.
The Subsidiary Alliance system was used by Lord Wellesley, who was Governor-General of India from 1798-1805, to build an empire in India. Under the system, the allying Indian state's ruler was compelled to accept the permanent stationing of a British force within his territory and to pay a subsidy for its maintenance. Also, the Indian ruler had to agree to the posting of a British Resident in his court. Under the Subsidiary Treaty, the Indian ruler could not employ any European in his service without the prior approval of the British. Nor could he negotiate with any other Indian ruler without consulting the Governor-General. In return for all this, the British agreed to defend the ruler from his enemies and adopt a policy of non-interference in the internal matters of the allied state. Subsidiary Alliance brought immense gains for the East India Company by extending the areas under British control and bringing relative peace in subsidies and territory. During the seven-year rule of Wellesley alone, over 100 small and big states of India signed the Subsidiary Treaty.
General Douglas Haig was the British ruler during the battle of Somme, i think.
Another ruler
Absolutely not. Cleopatra was a ruler. If she needed spies (which she did as did all ancient rulers) others did the work for her.Absolutely not. Cleopatra was a ruler. If she needed spies (which she did as did all ancient rulers) others did the work for her.Absolutely not. Cleopatra was a ruler. If she needed spies (which she did as did all ancient rulers) others did the work for her.Absolutely not. Cleopatra was a ruler. If she needed spies (which she did as did all ancient rulers) others did the work for her.Absolutely not. Cleopatra was a ruler. If she needed spies (which she did as did all ancient rulers) others did the work for her.Absolutely not. Cleopatra was a ruler. If she needed spies (which she did as did all ancient rulers) others did the work for her.Absolutely not. Cleopatra was a ruler. If she needed spies (which she did as did all ancient rulers) others did the work for her.Absolutely not. Cleopatra was a ruler. If she needed spies (which she did as did all ancient rulers) others did the work for her.Absolutely not. Cleopatra was a ruler. If she needed spies (which she did as did all ancient rulers) others did the work for her.
Queen Elizabeth I send an English captain to Surat to take permission for trade from the Mughal ruler that the Mughal ruler granted.King James I send his ambassador, Sir Thomas Roe. This is how the British gradually enter themselves in India and established the East India Company for their trade.
Queen Elizabeth I send an English captain to Surat to take permission for trade from the Mughal ruler that the Mughal ruler granted.King James I send his ambassador, Sir Thomas Roe. This is how the British gradually enter themselves in India and established the East India Company for their trade.