some people didnt believe alfred wegener because he didnt have all the info the scientist wanted. like if they asked him a question about his theory on pangea and he didnt know then how could he have the evidence on the continental drift so yeah if they asked him a question he wouldnt know and thats what my collage teacher said but im now in university and not studing that so :)
because they had no way of explaing how the continents could move
I can't figure it out, I'm in sixth grade, and I am doing a crossword puzzle, I think it's Alfred Wegner too, but that doesn't fit, please help:{
Most think that he was quite aware of the religious and scientific controversies the publication of his theory would engender. Plus, he was so meticulous in regards to evidence that he wanted to publish a book that would have been many pages longer than the ' abstract ' he did publish. Alfred Russel Wallace forced him to publish an ' abstract ' to flesh out there theory and present it to the public.
it required people to think more freely*(NovaNet answer)*
why do you think people didn't believe copernicus and galileo when they said the earth wasn't in the center of the solar system
It was inconceivable to them that something as large as a continent might move.
it makes sences
Alfred Wegener proposed it. He noticed similarities in fossils in places like Western Africa and Eastern South America. Then, he noted that those two continents could fit together, like puzzle pieces. He proposed that they used to be joined, and although his theory was not taken seriously at first, we now know he was correct.
I think that this theory is true only for some people. For Christian people, this theory are wrong, because they believe that people is God's creation.
I can't figure it out, I'm in sixth grade, and I am doing a crossword puzzle, I think it's Alfred Wegner too, but that doesn't fit, please help:{
because he is duhhhhhhhhhh
People did not agree with Alfred Wegener because he could not provide a driving force for his theory of Continental Drift, now known as Plate Tectonics. People used to think that the crust of the Earth was solid, so how could continents move about in something solid? It was only when it was proved that there were 2 types of crust, Ocean and Continental, and that the ocean crust was relatively new, that geologists were able to work out a driving force for the whole process. Convection currents in the mantle.
i dont think anyone couldve tested that theory since no computer models in the 1800s. it was supported by fossil and glaciation evidence though. and offcourse later supported furthur by plate tectonics
J. Alfred Prufrock worries that people will say he is "timid" and "politic."
Most think that he was quite aware of the religious and scientific controversies the publication of his theory would engender. Plus, he was so meticulous in regards to evidence that he wanted to publish a book that would have been many pages longer than the ' abstract ' he did publish. Alfred Russel Wallace forced him to publish an ' abstract ' to flesh out there theory and present it to the public.
a model is different than a theory a model is an actually picture or structure of something a theory is what people might think about something
it required people to think more freely*(NovaNet answer)*
Many people think realism is a very interesting theory.