0
Strictly speaking, this question is in the wrong order, because Charles Darwin and evolution pre-dated the intelligent design argument.
At the time of Charles Darwin, in the nineteenth century, most people in Europe and the Americas believed that God created all living things just as we see them now. Thus, there was no reason for the intelligent design argument, which holds that if evolution occurred then it must have been guided by an unseen deity.
Intelligent design is in part a political phenomenon, created in the United States because the Courts rejected the teaching of creationism, and then 'creation science', as science in the school syllabus. The proponents of intelligent design believed that, by separating claims for the existence of God from their hypothesis about design of living organisms, the courts would accept intelligent design as a suitable topic for a science course, taught alongside, or instead of, evolution. However, this was as weak an argument as those previously submitted for creationism and creation science, and intelligent design continues to be regarded as a religious argument, not a scientific one.
For more information, please visit: http://christianity.answers.com/theology/the-story-of-creation
Wiki User
∙ 9y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What do logical fallacies do?
They weaken an argument
Which of the following can be a result of a person's logic containing errors that weaken his or her argument?
Poor decision-making, flawed reasoning, and incorrect conclusions can be the results of a person's logic containing errors that weaken their argument.
Why stereotyping in an argumentative essay could weaken the strength of one's argument and discredit the writer?
Stereotyping in an argumentative essay can weaken the strength of the argument because it oversimplifies complex issues and fails to consider individual differences or perspectives. It discredits the writer as it shows a lack of critical thinking and research, relying on broad generalizations instead. This can undermine the credibility of the argument and diminish its persuasiveness.
What does it mean if an argument has logical fallacies?
If an argument has logical fallacies, it means that there are errors in reasoning that weaken the argument's validity. Logical fallacies can include flaws in how premises relate to the conclusion, irrelevant information, or faulty assumptions. Identifying and addressing these fallacies can strengthen the overall logic of the argument.
What can be a result of a person's logic containing errors that weaken his or her argument?
Type your answer here... A logical fallacy
What is used to support an opposing argument?
Counterarguments or evidence that contradicts or challenges the main argument can be used to support an opposing argument. These counterarguments present different perspectives and provide alternative explanations or ideas that weaken the strength of the original argument. They help to foster critical thinking and ensure an examination of various viewpoints before arriving at a conclusion.
What a verbal or oral response to an argument presenting an opposite viewpoint.?
A rebuttal to an argument presenting an opposite viewpoint would involve offering counterpoints that challenge the logic or evidence of the original argument. It aims to weaken the opposing argument and strengthen one's own position. Effective rebuttals often address specific claims or holes in the opponent's reasoning.
Lincoln justified his Emancipation Proclamation on the basis of?
Lincoln made the argument that the Emancipation Proclamation was a military necessity. Lincoln believed the proclamation would weaken the South.
How does avoiding the use of logical fallacies help your argument?
How is bias shown in an argument
How is an argument usedaccording the essay logical fallacies?
Logical fallacies in argumentation are errors in reasoning that can weaken an argument's effectiveness or validity. By understanding logical fallacies, one can identify flawed reasoning in an argument and avoid using them to strengthen their own arguments. By avoiding logical fallacies, one can construct more sound and persuasive arguments.
A person in a debate looks for fallacy in the opposing argument because?
they want to point out flaws in the reasoning or logic of the opposing argument to weaken its credibility and strengthen their own position. Identifying fallacies can help to expose weak points or errors in the opponent's argument, making their position less convincing to the audience. By highlighting fallacies, the person aims to persuade others that their own argument is stronger and more valid.
A strong opening argument will avoid?
A strong opening argument will avoid being overly aggressive or confrontational, as this may alienate the audience. It should also refrain from making sweeping generalizations or assumptions, as this can weaken the credibility of the argument. Instead, the opening should focus on presenting clear and compelling evidence to support the main points.
