0
Strictly speaking, this question is in the wrong order, because Charles Darwin and evolution pre-dated the intelligent design argument.
At the time of Charles Darwin, in the nineteenth century, most people in Europe and the Americas believed that God created all living things just as we see them now. Thus, there was no reason for the intelligent design argument, which holds that if evolution occurred then it must have been guided by an unseen deity.
Intelligent design is in part a political phenomenon, created in the United States because the Courts rejected the teaching of creationism, and then 'creation science', as science in the school syllabus. The proponents of intelligent design believed that, by separating claims for the existence of God from their hypothesis about design of living organisms, the courts would accept intelligent design as a suitable topic for a science course, taught alongside, or instead of, evolution. However, this was as weak an argument as those previously submitted for creationism and creation science, and intelligent design continues to be regarded as a religious argument, not a scientific one.
For more information, please visit: http://christianity.answers.com/theology/the-story-of-creation
What else can I help you with?
What do logical fallacies do?
They weaken an argument
Which of the following can be a result of a person's logic containing errors that weaken his or her argument?
Poor decision-making, flawed reasoning, and incorrect conclusions can be the results of a person's logic containing errors that weaken their argument.
Why stereotyping in an argumentative essay could weaken the strength of one's argument and discredit the writer?
Stereotyping in an argumentative essay can weaken the strength of the argument because it oversimplifies complex issues and fails to consider individual differences or perspectives. It discredits the writer as it shows a lack of critical thinking and research, relying on broad generalizations instead. This can undermine the credibility of the argument and diminish its persuasiveness.
What's a fallacy and how can it impact the validity of an argument?
A fallacy is a mistaken belief or flawed reasoning that can weaken the validity of an argument. Fallacies can mislead people by making an argument seem convincing even though it is not logically sound. It is important to identify and avoid fallacies in order to have a strong and credible argument.
What does it mean if an argument has logical fallacies?
If an argument has logical fallacies, it means that there are errors in reasoning that weaken the argument's validity. Logical fallacies can include flaws in how premises relate to the conclusion, irrelevant information, or faulty assumptions. Identifying and addressing these fallacies can strengthen the overall logic of the argument.
How can one identify a fallacy in an argument?
One can identify a fallacy in an argument by looking for errors in reasoning or misleading tactics that weaken the argument's validity. Common fallacies include ad hominem attacks, straw man arguments, and appeals to emotion rather than logic.
How do assumptions function in an argument?
Assumptions serve as foundational beliefs or ideas that are taken for granted in an argument. They shape the reasoning and interpretation of evidence presented, but can also introduce bias or weaken the argument if they are not explicitly stated or agreed upon by all parties involved. Acknowledging and addressing assumptions is important for constructing a strong and coherent argument.
What can be a result of a person's logic containing errors that weaken his or her argument?
Type your answer here... A logical fallacy
What are the potential consequences of making an invalid inference in a logical argument?
Making an invalid inference in a logical argument can lead to a flawed conclusion or decision. This can result in misunderstandings, incorrect assumptions, and ultimately, unreliable or misleading outcomes. It can also weaken the credibility of the argument and diminish the effectiveness of the reasoning presented.
What is used to support an opposing argument?
Counterarguments or evidence that contradicts or challenges the main argument can be used to support an opposing argument. These counterarguments present different perspectives and provide alternative explanations or ideas that weaken the strength of the original argument. They help to foster critical thinking and ensure an examination of various viewpoints before arriving at a conclusion.
What a verbal or oral response to an argument presenting an opposite viewpoint.?
A rebuttal to an argument presenting an opposite viewpoint would involve offering counterpoints that challenge the logic or evidence of the original argument. It aims to weaken the opposing argument and strengthen one's own position. Effective rebuttals often address specific claims or holes in the opponent's reasoning.
Lincoln justified his Emancipation Proclamation on the basis of?
Lincoln made the argument that the Emancipation Proclamation was a military necessity. Lincoln believed the proclamation would weaken the South.
