answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

The oldest life fossils are very simple - prokaryotic no doubt and not that different from many of today's prokaryotic cell structure. Evolution in general seems to be an increase in complexity. Thus the first cells would logically be prokaryotic, or at least noneukaryotic. This is because prokaryotic cells are much simpler than prokaryotic cells which contain multiple membranous organelles to complicate their structure. Note that just because the oldest life fossils are prokaryotic does not prove that they preceeded the eukaryotes or that they were the VERY FIRST life on earth. Can there be simpler life than prokaryotes one wonders? However, no fossils have been found that are older than those 'first' prokaryotes, and as I have said it would be illogical for more complex eukaryotes to precede the simpler prokaryotes. The oldest fossils therefore (between 3.5 and 3.8 billion years old) are thus accepted as both the first life and prokaryotic.

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

Aside from the awkward grammar, no, they were not.  Protists are actually Eukaryotic.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

The have no membrane enclosed organelles. This is a feature exclusive to Prokaryotes.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

prokaryotes where not the first cell on earth, protocells where

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

They are unicellular (one-celled) organisms and are closer to the original cellular organism in the line of evolution.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Where protist were the first prokaryotic organisms on Earth?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp