0
Apex Experimental results are not reliable if they are not repeatable.
Wiki User
∙ 8y ago
Wiki User
∙ 6y agoIf they could not be repeated, then they were not accurate in the first place. If the experiment shows a scientific fact, then that fact should not change if you do the experiment again.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Does an experiment need to be repeatable?
It is only science if it can be repeated, so yes, experiments do need to be repeatable in order for something to be proven. The results of the experiment should be comperable if something is to be learned.
Examples of science-related beliefs?
When it comes to superstitions, there are none. Science relies on repeatable, redundant results from experiments in order to consider it valid. Superstition relies on a weakness of a believer.
An experiment should only be done once or you might come up with different and confusing resultrue or false?
Very False. Science experiments are only worthwhile if they are repeatable and repeated.
Which shows that the results of an experiment are reliable?
An experiment in which the results are repeatable....apex
Experiment and investigation must be A. approved B. unreproduceable c repeatable d accepted which is it?
C. Repeatable
Why must the outcomes of experiments be repeatable?
The outcomes must be repeatable because if the outcome keeps changing, then something must have changed during one of the experiments, giving you the different outcome.
What must Experiments and investigations must be?
They must be repeatable
What makes a scientist right?
The scientist must propose an idea and document it with experiments that prove it. The experiments must be repeatable by others and the same result must be obtained by them
Why does science have problem with superstition?
Science relies on repeatable, redundant results from experiments in order to consider it valid.
Does an experiment need to be repeatable?
It is only science if it can be repeated, so yes, experiments do need to be repeatable in order for something to be proven. The results of the experiment should be comperable if something is to be learned.
Why is the hypothesis black cats cause bad luck not science?
The results of studying the hypothesis are not repeatable and are open to judgement. The hypothesis cannot be tested by controlled experiments.
Superstition beliefs and scientific approach beliefs?
Science relies on repeatable, redundant results from experiments in order to consider it valid. Superstition relies a weakness in a believer.
Why is the hypothesis that black cats cause bad luck not science?
The results of studying the hypothesis are not repeatable and are open to judgement. The hypothesis cannot be tested by controlled experiments.
What is the meaning of repeatable?
The task was repeatable so was boring. Repeatable means something that repeats itself.
What is meaning of repeatable?
The task was repeatable so was boring. Repeatable means something that repeats itself.
An experiment should only be done once or you might come up with different and confusing resultrue or false?
Very False. Science experiments are only worthwhile if they are repeatable and repeated.
Examples of science-related beliefs?
When it comes to superstitions, there are none. Science relies on repeatable, redundant results from experiments in order to consider it valid. Superstition relies on a weakness of a believer.
