answersLogoWhite

0

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

Why do historians have to evaluate the primary and secondary sources they used to answer questions?

to be happy


Why do historians have to evaluate primary and secondary sources they use to answer their questions?

to be happy


Why do historians have to evaluate the primary and the secondary sources they used to answer their questions?

to be happy


Why do historians have to to evaluate the primary and secondary sources they use to answer their questions?

just give me the answer it isnt hard


What tools do historians use?

Primary sources, secondary sources, and oral history.


What tools do historians?

historians use primary soucres and secondary sources


In order to make a valid historical interpretation about an event historians must?

check primary and secondary sources related to the event - apex


Are primary sources or secondary sources more valuable to modern historians?

secondary


How would a secondary source be beneficial to a historian studying a particular event. and ldquoApex and?

It would eliminate the need for her to evaluate primary sources that have already been analyzed by other historians.


Why would researcher use primary source instead of a secondary source when analyzing a historical event?

Answer this question… To evaluate the perspective of a witness to the event


Why would a researcher uses a primary source instead of a secondary source when analyzing a historical event?

Answer this question… To evaluate the perspective of a witness to the event


Why would a researcher use a primary source instead of a secondary source when analyzing a historical events?

Answer this question… To evaluate the perspective of a witness to the event