0
What else can I help you with?
Which best explains how a historian synthesizes evidence to reach a conclusion?
The historian makes comparisons among multiple primary and secondary sources.
Definition of a secondary source?
A secondry source is a source that does not come from the time that a historian is studying for example: -A book about world war 1 is a secondry source because it did not come from the time a historian was sdudying it got it's information from another source
Definition of secondary data?
Secondary data's are the historical statistical data's which are maintained by internal and external agencies which best describes the historic trends of a particular organization or a product and can be accessed by proper authentication from the concerned for any productive purpose.
What do you call a secondary source which has primary sources in it?
It is a secondary source.
What is a secondary conflict?
A secondary conflict is a an event that is important but isn't part of the main conflict. It's still important but secondary to the main.
How would a secondary sources be beneficial to a historian studying a particular event?
Secondary sources provide historians with interpretations and analyses of primary data, offering context and insights that may not be immediately apparent from original documents alone. They synthesize information from various primary sources, helping to highlight trends, differing perspectives, and scholarly debates surrounding the event. Additionally, secondary sources often include citations and references that can guide historians toward further research and primary materials. Overall, they enrich a historian's understanding by situating events within broader historical narratives.
A person who studies people from the past?
A person who studies people from the past is called a historian. Historians analyze primary and secondary sources to understand and interpret past events, societies, and cultures. They may specialize in a particular time period or region.
Which best explains how a historian synthesized evidence to reach a conclusion?
The historian makes comparisons among multiple primary and secondary sources.
Which best explains how a historian synthesizes evidence to reach a conclusion?
The historian makes comparisons among multiple primary and secondary sources.
Is a historian's account of Julius Caesar's victory against Spain a primary or secondary source and why?
A historian's account of Julius Caesar's victory against Spain is a secondary source not a primary source. Secondary sources analyze and explain primary sources. Primary sources are documents or objects that were created during the time being studied.
What situations would a historian most likely need to use secondary sources?
When researching recent theories about the Cold War.
What items in the list of secondary sources a historian could use to contextualize why a political revolution occurred Egypt in 2011?
ll and lll
When is compaction of secondary storage beneficial from the file manager and perspective?
it help to create room for new data
What items in the list are secondary sources a historian could use to contextualize why a political revolution occurred in Egypt in 2011?
II and III apex :)
What two main types of sources does a historian use?
A historian uses primary sources, which are firsthand accounts or original documents from the time under study, to gain a direct understanding of historical events. They also use secondary sources, such as books or articles written by other scholars, which interpret and analyze primary sources to provide context and a broader understanding of the historical period.
Was the railroad map a primary or secondary source?
A map would be a primary source. It is a creation during a particular time; a relic or artifact.
What items could serve as a secondary source for a historian studying early Chinese history?
An essay about China's first emperor written by a university professor
