answersLogoWhite

0

When researching recent theories about the Cold War.

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

Where would you most likely find secondary sources?

Archives,Museums,libraries


Which strategy would a historian most likely use to determine whether a source is valid?

checking its conclusions against other sources


Which action would a historian most likely take in order to determine whether the passage draws a valid conclusion?

Determine how many battles during WW2 took place near small farming towns. :)


Which historical thinking skill is the historian using?

The historian is likely using the skill of sourcing, which involves examining the origin of information to determine its credibility and relevance to the historical narrative. By identifying the sources of historical information, historians can better evaluate the context and perspective from which the information is presented.


Is most likely to be a secondary source A. A newspaper article B. A journal article C. A scientific lecture D. A scientific paper?

A. A newspaper article is most likely to be a secondary source as it typically reports on information gathered from primary sources such as research studies or interviews.


What is most likely to provide a historian with credible information about a historical figure?

Primary sources such as letters, diaries, and firsthand accounts from the time period are most likely to provide historians with credible information about a historical figure. These sources offer insights directly from the individual or people who knew them, making them valuable for understanding the person's life and impact.


What question is most likely answered by a historian but not an archaeologist?

Why a temple was built.


What strategy would a historian most likely to use to determine whether a source is valid?

A historian would likely assess the validity of a source by examining its authorship, context, and purpose, considering who created it, when, and why. They would also evaluate the source’s credibility by cross-referencing it with other reliable sources and checking for biases or inconsistencies. Additionally, analyzing the intended audience and the medium of the source can provide insights into its reliability and relevance.


Why can a secondary source be more helpful than a primary source sometimes?

Answer this question… To evaluate the perspective of a witness to the event


Is a mountain lion a decomposer?

no its a consumer. most likely a secondary consumer no its a consumer. most likely a secondary consumer


Is a dissertation a primary source?

They are usually secondary sources, but can be a primary source depending on the topic of the dissertation. If you are looking for primary sources you might be able to find many primary sources within the bibliography of a dissertation, since most of these scholars would have most likely referred to primary documents while drafting their dissertation.


What historian is interested to learn whether or not a new biography about a Roman Emperor is likely to be biased?

?