0
Which action would a historian most likely take in order to determine whether the passage draws a valid conclusion?
Determine how many battles during WW2 took place near small farming towns. :)
What else can I help you with?
It Comes after a hypothesis and is used to determine whether the hypothesis is correct?
Test your hypothesis by Doing an Experiment
What question would help in determining whether the conclusion above valid?
To determine whether the conclusion is valid, you could ask, "What evidence supports the premises leading to this conclusion?" This question encourages an examination of the logical connections and the reliability of the data or assumptions that underpin the conclusion. Additionally, asking, "Are there any counterexamples or alternative explanations that challenge this conclusion?" can help assess its robustness.
What does a scientist need to do once an experiment is complete what must a scientist do to determine whether the data support the hypothesis?
They come up with a conclusion to the hypothesis
What should a conclusion contain in a science report?
Your conclusion should say whether your hypothesis was right and if it worked.
Can you draw a conclusion from these data why or why not?
To determine whether a conclusion can be drawn from the data, it's essential to consider the context, sample size, and reliability of the data. If the data is representative, statistically significant, and addresses the research question clearly, a conclusion can be made. However, if the data is limited, biased, or lacks context, then drawing a reliable conclusion would be inappropriate. Thus, the ability to conclude depends on the quality and comprehensiveness of the data presented.
Can a historian determine whether or not a claim is valid?
Check to see that it is supported by historical evidence.
Which method will best help you determine whether or not a secondary source's conclusion is valid?
Answer this question… Comparing the conclusion with several other sources
What is the best way to determine whether the historian's interpretation is valid?
If the question is: A historian is writing a book about the fall of the Soviet Union. He claims that the country collapsed because it spent too much of its money on its military rather than providing domestic services to its people. What is the best way to determine whether the historian’s interpretation is valid? Then the answer would be: Corroborate the interpretation with other secondary sources.
Which strategy would a historian most likely use to determine whether a source is valid?
checking its conclusions against other sources
It Comes after a hypothesis and is used to determine whether the hypothesis is correct?
Test your hypothesis by Doing an Experiment
What question would help in determining whether the conclusion above valid?
To determine whether the conclusion is valid, you could ask, "What evidence supports the premises leading to this conclusion?" This question encourages an examination of the logical connections and the reliability of the data or assumptions that underpin the conclusion. Additionally, asking, "Are there any counterexamples or alternative explanations that challenge this conclusion?" can help assess its robustness.
What does a scientist need to do once an experiment is complete what must a scientist do to determine whether the data support the hypothesis?
They come up with a conclusion to the hypothesis
what-Determine whether the third statement is a logical conclusion from the first two given statements.?
No
A student observes that an organism is green A valid conclusion that can be drawn from this observation is that?
4 ..not enough information is given to determine whether the organism is a plant or an animal
Which of the following historians has organized her study of the pass based on the category period?
Which method will best help you determine whether or not a secondary source is conclusion is valid?
What is it called when scientists state whether their data confirmed or rejected the hypothesis?
Drawing a conclusion apex
Is the conclusion affirmative or negative?
To determine whether the conclusion is affirmative or negative, one would need to analyze the specific statement or argument being presented. An affirmative conclusion typically asserts that something is true or valid, while a negative conclusion denies or rejects a proposition. If you provide the context or content of the conclusion in question, I can help clarify its nature.
