0
Which action would a historian most likely take in order to determine whether the passage draws a valid conclusion?
Determine how many battles during WW2 took place near small farming towns. :)
What else can I help you with?
It Comes after a hypothesis and is used to determine whether the hypothesis is correct?
Test your hypothesis by Doing an Experiment
What question would help in determining whether the conclusion above valid?
To determine whether the conclusion is valid, you could ask, "What evidence supports the premises leading to this conclusion?" This question encourages an examination of the logical connections and the reliability of the data or assumptions that underpin the conclusion. Additionally, asking, "Are there any counterexamples or alternative explanations that challenge this conclusion?" can help assess its robustness.
What does a scientist need to do once an experiment is complete what must a scientist do to determine whether the data support the hypothesis?
They come up with a conclusion to the hypothesis
What should a conclusion contain in a science report?
Your conclusion should say whether your hypothesis was right and if it worked.
Do the premises sufficiently support the conclusions?
This depends on the specific premises and conclusion being evaluated. In general, premises that provide strong and relevant evidence in support of the conclusion can be considered sufficient. However, if there are logical gaps or missing information in the premises that weaken the connection to the conclusion, then the premises may not be sufficient. Critical analysis is necessary to determine whether the premises adequately support the conclusion.
Can a historian determine whether or not a claim is valid?
Check to see that it is supported by historical evidence.
Which method will best help you determine whether or not a secondary source's conclusion is valid?
Answer this question… Comparing the conclusion with several other sources
What is the best way to determine whether the historian's interpretation is valid?
If the question is: A historian is writing a book about the fall of the Soviet Union. He claims that the country collapsed because it spent too much of its money on its military rather than providing domestic services to its people. What is the best way to determine whether the historian’s interpretation is valid? Then the answer would be: Corroborate the interpretation with other secondary sources.
It Comes after a hypothesis and is used to determine whether the hypothesis is correct?
Test your hypothesis by Doing an Experiment
Which strategy would a historian most likely use to determine whether a source is valid?
checking its conclusions against other sources
What question would help in determining whether the conclusion above valid?
To determine whether the conclusion is valid, you could ask, "What evidence supports the premises leading to this conclusion?" This question encourages an examination of the logical connections and the reliability of the data or assumptions that underpin the conclusion. Additionally, asking, "Are there any counterexamples or alternative explanations that challenge this conclusion?" can help assess its robustness.
What does a scientist need to do once an experiment is complete what must a scientist do to determine whether the data support the hypothesis?
They come up with a conclusion to the hypothesis
what-Determine whether the third statement is a logical conclusion from the first two given statements.?
No
A student observes that an organism is green A valid conclusion that can be drawn from this observation is that?
4 ..not enough information is given to determine whether the organism is a plant or an animal
Which of the following historians has organized her study of the pass based on the category period?
Which method will best help you determine whether or not a secondary source is conclusion is valid?
What is it called when scientists state whether their data confirmed or rejected the hypothesis?
Drawing a conclusion apex
A reader trying to determine whether the historian's interpretation is valid would most likely?
A historian writes an essay on the rise of communism in China during the 20th century. She claims that communism would never have taken hold in the country if the Soviet Union has not supplied the Chiese commuunists with money and military equipment.
