0
What is the best way to determine whether the historian's interpretation is valid?
If the question is:
A historian is writing a book about the fall of the Soviet Union. He claims that the country collapsed because it spent too much of its money on its military rather than providing domestic services to its people. What is the best way to determine whether the historian’s interpretation is valid?
Then the answer would be:
Corroborate the interpretation with other secondary sources.
What else can I help you with?
Which of the following ladies and attendants is not a valid match?
Desdemona And Bianca
What is the need for a grammar in system programming?
To chech wheather the given input is valid or not,with semantically.
Why do people answer dumb questions on this site?
Because they are dumb. I agree people should put reasonable and valid answers!
How many watts is a 6 speaker home theater system?
Each system is different. Check your local listings. Your mileage may vary. Not valid in the state of New York, or where prohibited by law.
All clowns are funny individuals Some sad people are clowns Therefore some sad people are funny individuals Is this valid?
Of course. If all A is B, and some C is A, then some C is B.
Which of the following historians has organized her study of the pass based on the category period?
Which method will best help you determine whether or not a secondary source is conclusion is valid?
How can historians determine whether a claim is valid?
evaluate the evidence used to support it
Can a historian determine whether or not a claim is valid?
Check to see that it is supported by historical evidence.
What does statistical data such as census numbers do for geographers?
Help geographers determine whether their ideas are valid.
Who reviews a hazard report to determine whether it is a valid hazard and whether any immediate interim control measures are necessary?
Base Safety Office
How do you determine whether a point is on a given line or not?
Substitute the coordinates of the point into the equation of the line. If the equation is still valid then the point is on the line; if not then it is not.
Which strategy would a historian most likely use to determine whether a source is valid?
checking its conclusions against other sources
In order to make a valid historical interpretation about an event historians must?
check primary and secondary sources related to the event - apex
A reader trying to determine whether the historian's interpretation is valid would most likely?
A historian writes an essay on the rise of communism in China during the 20th century. She claims that communism would never have taken hold in the country if the Soviet Union has not supplied the Chiese commuunists with money and military equipment.
Determine whether the argument is valid or invalid Some children are energetic Some children are not polite Some polite people are not energetic?
Invalid
How can a historian determine whether or not a claim is valid?
modern historians usually try to determine what stories are true and false depending on whether or not there are multiple stories. In the case of the Gospels in the catholic bible, the people who put the bible together decided what went in because of what each story said meaning all 4 Gospels are historically accurate because they pretty much tell the same story (save for a few details) P.s. this my first answer
A student observes that an organism is green A valid conclusion that can be drawn from this observation is that?
4 ..not enough information is given to determine whether the organism is a plant or an animal
