Incumbency has better financed campaigns, for starters. But also, people feel like they are in good hands when they vote for an incumbency b/c that person has already dint this before so they have the political background and know what they are doing. That is what I have researched so far!
They have more exposure to the public. That means they are being shown on television or being advertised in newspapers. Unlike other candidates.
Incumbents have run in seven of the last twelve presidential elections.
more than 85% of PAC contributions in recent elections have gone to incumbents
Incumbents usually win.
incumbents running for re-elections
incumbents running for re-elections
incumbents running for re-elections
incumbents running for re-elections
It seems that a majority of voters tend to vote for incumbents no matter how wretchedly evil those incumbents are.
There are several reasons why incumbents are successful at getting re-elected. Firstly, they have the advantage of name recognition and visibility, which helps in building a strong voter base. Secondly, incumbents often have access to more resources, including funding and endorsements, which can boost their campaign efforts. Finally, incumbents can use their experience and track record to showcase their accomplishments and gain the trust and support of voters.
they have high name recognition, can take advantage of government research staffs and information, and have greater access to the media.
gerrymandering
"Incumbents" means the congressmen who are already in office. Because they can bring projects to their district, help people with government problems in their district, and raise more campaign money by being in office already, it is very hard for someone else to run against them.