0
Why do many people still argue about dicisions to drop atomic bonb on Japan in 1945?
Wiki User
∙ 6y ago
After the attack on Japan many military we given an opportunity to observe an atomic bomb explosion. Apparently the event was awe inspiring enough (You could see the flash even if you turned away as the light would penetrate your skull to the eyes through the back of your head) that many generals aid "I'd never ever use such a weapon!"Todays generals and leaders have never been up close and personal with that much destruction and think "It is just big bomb - we can use it!"
Politicians and generals are too feeble minded to see the reasons for a no nukes policy. Without demonstrations the best we can do id show what happened the last time.
Wiki User
∙ 6y ago
Wiki User
∙ 6y agoThe attacks ended the war, but killed many civilians and alarmed the Soviet Union. -Apex
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Why do people still argue about the decision to drop atomic bombs on Japan?
Some say that Truman wanted to send a message to the Soviet Union - Apex
What do many people still argue about the decision to drop atomic bombs on Japan in 1945?
The attacks ended the war, but killed many civilians and alarmed the Soviet Union. ~ apex
Why do many people still argue about the decision to drop atomic bombs on Japan in 194?
some say that truman wanted to send a message to the soviet union
What country does bonsai originate from?
The general opinion is that it originated in Japan although some people argue it started in China then Japan.
Was the use of the atomic bomb justifiable at the time it was dropped in world war 2?
Some people think it was, others argue that it was not.
What occurred in Hiroshima and Nagasaki Japan in 1945?
That's the easiest question ever... Of course the Atomic bombs were dropped, ending the war with Japan. But some argue the second bomb wasn't needed. America didn't give Japan a chance to surrender after the first bomb, because the second was dropped within days of the first.
Who argue against the use of the atomic bombs state that?
Millions will die and the earth will be destroyed.
Those who argue against the use of the atomic bombs state that?
Millions will die and the earth will be destroyed.
Was the atomic bombing of hiroshima unjustified?
Questions like these come down to personal opinion. One might argue that it was a need, where one might argue it was a greed. There is no "correct" answer.
Why America should't have used the atomic bombs?
It is certainly possible to argue that the use of atomic bombs against Japan killed indiscriminately, that it was cruel, that it caused hundreds of thousands of cases of cancer well after the war was over, and that it sets a dangerous precedent for the use of nuclear weapons in the future. However, I also know of excellent arguments in support of the atomic bombing of Japan. I am not going to mention all of them, but remember before you condemn America, that Japan was at war with America by its own choice. America did not even want to get involved in WW II, but was left no choice after the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor. You reap what you sow.
Why does your boyfriend argue with you then with the people who cause us problems?
There are two interpretations of your question: 1. Why does my boyfriend argue with me first and then argue with the people who cause us problems? 2. Why does my boyfriend argue with me rather than with the people who cause us problems? Which is it?
When was ninjutsu invented?
Well, the origins date back to vagabonds fighting arts in China, but the concepts and the art was originated from Japan. Sadly there are many people who study Ninjutsu that argue over this, but really both answers are correct ... China or Japan.
