0
Why do scientists deny that modern science is actually developed from ancient myth?
Let us conduct a little thought experiment. Suppose we have three groups. One of them believes in Greek mythology. One of them accepts Hindu mythology. The third accepts no theology whatsoever. Each of these groups develops the scientific method independent of one another. How do their scientific findings differ from one another?
The answer with this thought experiment becomes obvious. Science is NOT developed from ancient mythology. Galileo is considered the father of modern scientific methodology, with his emphasis on observation, theory, and experimentation. The wavelengths of visible light remain the same no matter what a scientist's mythological background might be.
This answer is not right. History of modern science showed its origin came from ancient mythology and mysticism. Whether chemistry, physics, or astronomy one can find so many scientific terms are basically taken from ancient mythology whether from Greek, from Egypt or from India.
Modern science did not born with soul contribution. It improves the ancient knowledge streams and got an identity as modern science. Modern science failed to find out the right definition of work and time. It has lot of other limitation and not very dependable for matter relating to living creature. Instead of Modern science it should be termed as a Material science.
What else can I help you with?
What is culture areas?
an advanced culture where people have developed cities, farming, science and industries; examples are Aztecs, Incas, ancient Egypt, ancient Rome and ancient Greece. :):)
Who was the first scientist in the timeline to change ancient beliefs about science?
Science and scientists use the scientific method, which was first proposed by Galileo in 1638. Therefore there can have been on "ancient beliefs about science" before then.
What has the author Shizu Zhong written?
Shizu Zhong has written: 'Ancient China's scientists' -- subject(s): Biography, History, Science, Scientists
What are the scientist contributions to science and technology?
By definition, science is created by scientists. There is no science without scientists, so the level of contribution of scientists to science is 100%. Technology requires science as well.
What harm does science do to mankind?
I don't think so. The amount of lives science has saved: Most operational procedures use science that was discovered by scientists. Helicopters that airlift people were developed by engineering founded on science. I'm sure you can think of many more. Sure, when we have to discover things we sometimes have to do some harm in the process, but then if we didn't, we wouldn't have Mythbusters!
What is the name of a person involved with science?
Science developed in Ancient times to give more logical proof and things, and advanced in the Renaissance. It was an idea of the Scientific Method, there wasn't really a person who started science.
Why are scientists conceived as being atheist?
Not all scientists are atheists and many actually believe in a God or a higher diety or dieties who oversees us and helps us in life and afterwards. However, many scientists believe that after studying science, that everything can be explained by science and that no higher beings were involved in any manner.
Who is the founder of nuclear science?
Ernest Rutherford is the physicist who is known as the founder of or father of nuclear science. He not only developed the concept of radioactive half-life, he is noted for being the first to split the atom, and the first to discover the proton.
Why are scientists called scientists?
because they study about Science
How many scientists get infosys science prize?
six scientists get infosys science prize in five catogries.
Who is the father of science-?
Aristotle was the father of science. He was the first to classify animals and plants. He also developed the inductive-deductive method.
A brief history of Science in ancient Egypt?
ancient science in egypt
