0
Why do scientists try to use many individuals in the it experiments?
Wiki User
∙ 8y agoWant this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
When scientists analyze the results of their experiments then they?
They see if the results are what they expected them to be. If they were not, they try again. If they did, they then ask other scientists if they also got the same results. They do this part by publishing the experiment and results in a scientific journal and as for comments.
Why should scientists do repeated trials with every experiment?
According to the scientific method they do it because the first time they try the experiment, the results might be wrong. In the case of which many experiments are being tested multiple times, scientists want to make sure that there results are correctly answered.
When scientists are ready to publish the result of their experimentation why is it important for them to include a description of the procedures they used?
Good science is reproducible, meaning that other scientists should be able to conduct the same analysis and get similar results. If scientists try the experiments and get different results, then it often means that the original publishers did something wrong.
Why do scientist try to test many individuals?
In an experiment that involves many people or animals, it is important to test many individuals to avoid experimental error. If only one individual were to be tested in the experiment, it would be difficult to say whether the results were a product of the test, or if it was just a result that the particular individual produced. By testing many, scientists can say definitively that their hypothesis was correct or incorrect because a wide variety of test subjects responded in the same way.
When scientist are ready to publish the results of their experimentation why is it important for them to include a description of the procedures the used?
Good science is reproducible, meaning that other scientists should be able to conduct the same analysis and get similar results. If scientists try the experiments and get different results, then it often means that the original publishers did something wrong.
Why do scientists try to use many individuals in their experoments?
Because the greater the number of organisms that they test, the more certain they can be of a data. :)
How did alchemists similar to and different from modern scientists?
The alchemists were the first chemists. But in addition to mixing chemicals, they also believed that magic would help with their experiments and formulas. It didn't. But their experiments led to the development of the science of chemistry.
Scientists publish the details of important experiments so that?
Scientists publish the details of important experiments so that: 1. Others can try to reproduce the results. 2. Their work can be repeated. 3. Their experimental procedures can be reviewed.
When scientists analyze the results of their experiments then they?
They see if the results are what they expected them to be. If they were not, they try again. If they did, they then ask other scientists if they also got the same results. They do this part by publishing the experiment and results in a scientific journal and as for comments.
Why should scientists do repeated trials with every experiment?
According to the scientific method they do it because the first time they try the experiment, the results might be wrong. In the case of which many experiments are being tested multiple times, scientists want to make sure that there results are correctly answered.
Why do scientists try to identify as many relevant variables as possible?
Scientists try to identify as many relevant variables as possible in order to understand the complexity of natural phenomena and to make accurate predictions about how various factors interact with one another. By considering a wide range of variables, scientists can better account for potential influences on the outcomes of their experiments and studies. This comprehensive approach leads to more robust and reliable conclusions.
What else do sciestist do other than organze the data?
Scientists also design and perform the experiments in which the data was collected. They also analyze the data and try to explain them.
Is it true that biologists discover problems by observing the world around them?
Yes. Observation leads to the identification of a phenomenon or problem, and scientists would then try to formulate a hypothesis to explain the phenomenon or solve the problem. Then the scientist would devise experiments to test the hypothesis. Should the hypothesis fail, the scientist can formulate the new hypothesis. If the hypothesis holds, more experiments must be done to verify it. Only when a hypothesis is tested by many experiments by many people can it be called a theory.
Why do scientists try test many individuals?
In an experiment that involves many people or animals, it is important to test many individuals to avoid experimental error. If only one individual were to be tested in the experiment, it would be difficult to say whether the results were a product of the test, or if it was just a result that the particular individual produced. By testing many, scientists can say definitively that their hypothesis was correct or incorrect because a wide variety of test subjects responded in the same way.
Why do scientists try to test individuals?
In an experiment that involves many people or animals, it is important to test many individuals to avoid experimental error. If only one individual were to be tested in the experiment, it would be difficult to say whether the results were a product of the test, or if it was just a result that the particular individual produced. By testing many, scientists can say definitively that their hypothesis was correct or incorrect because a wide variety of test subjects responded in the same way.
When scientists are ready to publish the result of their experimentation why is it important for them to include a description of the procedures they use?
Good science is reproducible, meaning that other scientists should be able to conduct the same analysis and get similar results. If scientists try the experiments and get different results, then it often means that the original publishers did something wrong.
When scientists are ready to publish the results of their experimentation why is it important for them to include a description of the procedure they used?
Good science is reproducible, meaning that other scientists should be able to conduct the same analysis and get similar results. If scientists try the experiments and get different results, then it often means that the original publishers did something wrong.
