answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Religion by definition requires faith. Faith and science are fundamentally incompatible.

Science is based on Natural Laws. Religion on faith alone. If you require proofs for what you believe in, then the word "Faith" is only an illusion.

AnswerNot all people think this way. The Christians who helped to found modern science, believed they were 'thinking God's thoughts after him'. Johannes Kepler specifically dedicated his works to the glory of God. Sir Isaac newton, who some consider the greatest scientist who ever lived wrote more on theology than science. He also used the design in the universe to witness to colleagues regarding the maker of it. Werner Von Braun while at NASA sought to give God the glory as the creator of the universe which he was helping to explore.

The division which today exists in many minds between science and religion, some trace to the philosophy of Francis Bacon who sought to separate the two. Yet, the specifically anti-supernatural, anti-god, philosophy of Naturalism or just plain Atheism drives the thinking of many, Richard Dawkins being a good example. Thus the division is really in the mind of the person, in their presuppositions, not in reality.

Many Christians who are scientists in various fields of research, including world-leaders, do indeed give God the glory for their work and discoveries.

**

Isaac Newton (1642-1727)

English physicist, mathematician, and natural philosopher, considered one of the most important scientists of all time

When the adversaries of Erasmus had got the Trinity into his edition, they threw by their manuscript as an old almanac out of date.

-- Isaac Newton, letter to a Friend, later published by Bishop Horsley, quoted from John E Remsberg, The Christ, p. 259, after Erasmus had inserted the following passage, the only to teach Trinitarianism, into his second edition of his New Testament: "For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one" (I John v, 7).

What the Latins have done in this text (1 John v, 7) the Greeks have done to Paul (1 Tim. iii, 16). They now read, "Great is the mystery of godliness; God manifest in the flesh"; whereas all the churches for the first four or five hundred years, and the authors of all the ancient versions, Jerome as well as the rest, read, "Great is the mystery of godliness, which was manifest in the flesh." Our English version makes it yet a little stronger. It reads, "Great is the mystery of godliness: God was manifest in the flesh."

-- Isaac Newton, letter to a Friend, later published by Bishop Horsley, quoted from John E Remsberg, The Christ, p. 263

If the ancient churches, in debating and deciding the greatest mysteries of religion, knew nothing of these two texts, I understand not why we should be so fond of them now the debate is over.

-- Isaac Newton, letter to a Friend, later published by Bishop Horsley, quoted from John E Remsberg, The Christ, p. 263

The daily disappearance and the subsequent rise of the sun appeared to many of the ancients as a true resurrection; thus, while the east came to be regarded as the source of light and warmth, happiness and glory, the west was associated with darkness and chill, decay and death. This led to the custom of burying the dead so as to face the east when they rose again, and of building temples and shrines with an opening toward the east. To effect this, Vitruvius, two thousand years ago, gave precise rules, which are still followed by Christian architects.

-- Isaac Newton, quoted from John E Remsberg, The Christ, p. 345-6

I know not how I seem to others, but to myself I am but a small child wandering upon the vast shores of knowledge, every now and then finding a small bright pebble to content myself with while the vast ocean of undiscovered truth lay before me.

-- Isaac Newton, quoted from John Stear, No Answers in Genesis

**

Johannes Kepler (1571-1630)

German astronomer who discovered that planetary orbits are ellipses

In theology we must consider the predominance of authority; in philosophy the predominance of reason.

-- Johannes Kepler, Astronomia nova, 1609, quoted from James A Haught, ed., 2000 Years of Disbelief

When miracles are admitted, every scientific explanation is out of the question.

-- Johannes Kepler, from Rufus K Noyes, Views of Religion, quoted from James A Haught, ed., 2000 Years of Disbelief

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Why do so many people think of science vs the Bible instead of science as a way to enjoy God's creation?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What has the author Glenn Gates Cole written?

Glenn Gates Cole has written: 'Creation and science' -- subject(s): Bible, Bible and science, Creation, Criticism, interpretation, Religion and science


Is the bible compatible with sciense?

Yes, the bible states some facts about creation and about life that science is yet to unvail...


What has the author Charles Bartlett Warring written?

Charles Bartlett Warring is known for writing "The Elements of Logic," a book published in 1884 that discusses logical principles and reasoning. Additionally, he has written other works on topics such as education and philosophy.


What has the author Walter E Lammerts written?

Walter E. Lammerts has written: 'Why Not Creation?' -- subject(s): Addresses, essays, lectures, Bible and science, Creation


What has the author Arthur James Maurer written?

Arthur James Maurer has written: 'Unveiling the mystery of creation' -- subject(s): Bible and science, Creation, Miscellanea


What has the author Elijah M Fly written?

Elijah M. Fly has written: 'The Bible true, or, The cosmogony of Moses compared with the facts of science' -- subject(s): Accessible book, Creation, Bible and science


What is a Christian science preacher called?

We do not have preachers in Christian Science. Instead, we get everything from the Bible, and a book written by our founder called The Science and Health.


What has the author Nathan Aviezer written?

Nathan Aviezer has written: 'Fossils and Faith' 'In the beginning--' -- subject(s): Bible, Bible and science, Creation, Criticism, interpretation


What has the author G J Keane written?

G. J. Keane has written: 'Special creation rediscovered' -- subject(s): Bible and science, Christianity, Creation, Evolution, Religious aspects of Evolution 'Creation rediscovered'


What has the author Giorgio Bartoli written?

Giorgio Bartoli has written: 'The Biblical story of creation in the light of the recently discovered Babylonian documents' -- subject(s): Religion and science, Creation, Bible and science 'The primitive church and the primacy of Rome' -- subject(s): Popes, Primacy


What has the author Bruce A Malone written?

Bruce A. Malone has written: 'Search for the truth' -- subject(s): Apologetics, Bible and science, Biblical cosmology, Christianity, Cosmogony, Creation, Creationism, Religious aspects of Creation


If science contradicts with the Bible then Science is wrong Agree or Disagree?

Depends upon whether one believes in the scientific creation or the biblical creation. No definitive answer can be achieved as to who is right or wrong. It also depends whether you believe in a naturalistic philosophy behind the science or whether you will interpret the facts according to pure science without such philosophy. Scientific facts do not speak for themselves nor can science make conclusions about something such as the Bible which is not a scientific document (this makes no statement about whether the Bible is true or not). If science is made to contradict the Bible then it has ceased to be science but is a philosophy. Science, as such does not and cannot contradict the Bible. Separate answer: Occasionally Science and the Bible do differ, but you can see that the Bible agrees with modern Science on several interesting points! Such as Job 26:7 Which says "...the Earth which is hanging upon nothing..." this was back when people believed the Earth was on the back of a giant animal, or some type of mythological "god". (Also see Isaiah 40:22 "...circle of the Earth...") So it's plain to see that the Bible is the inspired word of God, and if something in science contradicts the Bible, I believe the Bible would always be in the right. For more information you can go to www.watchtower.org ^^ The bible rarely is in line with science. There are several ways in which it is flat out wrong.. Let's list some examples, shall we? 1.) The age of the earth 2.) Evolution 3.) The animal food chain 4.) The diets of certain animals. 5.) Mathematics 6.) Weather 7.) Whether animals can talk or not 8.) The existence of mud people 9.) Virgin birth 10.) Zombies 11.) The heliocentric universe 12.) Dinosaurs etc