Want this question answered?
extracting energy from nuclear fuels is more expensive than extracting energy from fossil fuels
Most countries burn fossil fuels to generate electricity.If they used solar power to generate electricity, thenThey would not have to use so much fossil fuel.Solar Energy itself does not reduce the use of fossil fuels. But the use of solar energy should hopefully reduce the need of fossil fuels to create energy, so therefore the more we can use solar power as an energy source instead of fossil fuels, the more we reduce the use of fossil fuels.
There is a source of energy that is more friendly to the environment that has not been looked into yet such as using the force from the waves to power everything that fossil fuels are being used currently to power and you could use wind power as well to make a better alternative to fossil fuels
Most electricity is generated using coal, oil, natural gas, nuclear energy, or hydropower. Some production is done with alternative fuels like geothermal energy, wind power, biomass, solar energy, or fuel cells. The electricity you buy may be generated using one or more of these methods. No matter what fuels produce the electricity you use, your lights shine, your radio plays, and your computer runs in the same way.
Different fuels have different calorific values means that the different fuels have different energy contents. The consequence of this is that for a given energy output, more fuel is required with the liower calorific fuel.
they produce energy in a more environmentally friendly way then fossil fuels do
they produce energy in a more environmentally friendly way then fossil fuels do
Nuclear energy is a clean energy and doesn't pollute the atmosphere
as far as i know its because some fuels are atomically more dense than others, also because the technology we have may not burn some fuels as efficiently as others
Fossil fuel is not energy its a energy source and yes there is more energy sources besides the fossil fuel like coal and others.
extracting energy from nuclear fuels is more expensive than extracting energy from fossil fuels
I think it because there is more energy needed in order to break down the bonds in the hydrocarbon. Making it less efficient for fuels
extracting energy from nuclear fuels is more expensive than extracting energy from fossil fuels
Energy led human to burn more fossil fuels
The problem of disposing large amounts of nuclear waste is not resolved.
"Non-conventional" refers more or less to anything that is not fossil fuels. It may be solar energy (i.e., directly capturing the solar energy), or several other types of energy - such as wind energy, water energy, and many others more.
There are several benefits of using fossil fuels as compared to other forms of fuel. Some benefits are that fossil fuels are readily available in large quantity and are easy to process. Other benefits are that fossil fuels produce more energy and are cheaper.