All people are not the same; environment and genetics play huge roles in someone's iq. One could not expect people from poor backgrounds who no access to books and learning resources to score highly on I.Q tests, and this is why they are a flawed way of measuring intelligence.
A different answer...Hard to disagree with a statement like, "All people are not the same" -- and I don't disagree with that at all. But from that point on our answers diverge.IQ stands for "Intelligence Quotient". In this case, it refers to the subject's inherent intelligence, and specifically not to their education. These tests attempt to focus on reasoning and logic skills as opposed to one's comprehension of math, composition, etc. And the results are not intended to show how much one knows, but rather how much they potentially could develop.
What causes higher or lower IQ scores is the subject of many a doctoral thesis, and just as many arguments in the medical, social and educational sciences. Nature or nurture; we don't really know. Exceptionally bright children can arise from normal (in the statistical sense) parents in impoverished conditions, just as perfectly normal children can derive from genius parents in well endowed environments. While there appears to be a correlation between genetics, environment and IQ potential, we are far from clear about the root causes of this correlation.
As to IQ tests being flawed, they are to some extent. But this comes down to communications. If you only speak French, and the tests are available only in English, for instance, the tests cannot be valid. And what if you don't speak at all? In order for IQ testing to occur, there has to be a fundamental commonality at the point of communication. If one cannot read or speak, one cannot take an IQ test, and so the quality of the child's education and inherent ability to learn manifest in (hopefully) this one category. But what else would one do? With no communication, intelligence, as humans define it, is not measurable.
So in conclusion, yes -- the tests are flawed. But try and find a way around that flaw! :}
IQ is influenced by a combination of genetic and environmental factors. Factors such as genetics, education, nutrition, and cognitive stimulation can all contribute to variations in intelligence levels among individuals. Additionally, differences in brain structure and function may also play a role in determining IQ.
There may be various reasons why some people appear to receive more than others, such as luck, privilege, connections, or unequal distribution of resources. It is important to consider the broader societal and systemic factors at play rather than attributing it solely to individual deservingness.
People may feel more moral than others due to cognitive biases such as self-enhancement, where individuals tend to see themselves in a more positive light. Additionally, cultural or societal norms can influence one's beliefs about what is considered moral behavior. It's important to remember that morality is subjective and shaped by various factors, so perceptions of moral superiority may not always be accurate.
Having a higher IQ can provide some advantages in terms of problem-solving, learning ability, and cognitive skills. However, IQ is just one measure of intelligence, and it's essential to recognize that people have different strengths and abilities. It's more important to focus on developing skills, self-awareness, and emotional intelligence regardless of one's IQ level.
No, more people do not smoke weed than people who don't. According to studies, the majority of the global population does not use marijuana or any other recreational drugs.
People may be singled out and made fun of more than others due to various factors such as physical appearance, personality traits, behavior, or social status. It can also stem from societal biases or prejudices. Additionally, individuals who exhibit vulnerability or lack self-confidence may be more susceptible to being targeted for bullying or ridicule.
God made some higher than others!
Vegans are not necessarily better than other people. Some are healthier than other people, and some are not.
Diet coke is higher than most other pops because most people who are obese are trying to go on a diet.Plus, its healthier than other sodas since there is no sugar in it.
they are not.
It means a score equivalent to or higher than the top 88% of people who took it. In this case, that would mean your score was higher than that of 79-80 other people.
That you think that you are better than other people, that you see yourself higher
No, in some games they are worth the same amount and in other games the king is higher.
others, some people
A person or some people that has more authority than you or has authority over you.
some of them go higher than others.
Some people pay atention in class or work than others.
"Level" is a palindrome meaning "no part higher than the other."