Want this question answered?
You only change one variable; if you changed multiple variables you wouldn't know which one caused a change.
So the variable can be at constant.
Because you want to see how the experimental results change due to only that one variable change. If you used two variables, and the results varied, how would you know which variable contributed more to the change if at all? It can be done this way, but one variable at a time will allow you to make sense of your data much more efficiently.
the investigator only changes one variable in an experiment because they need to see how that one variable reacts. if you wanted to see how the dependent variable changed but changed the independent variable you would not see how the one variable reacts.
I only know of two constants in the universe. One is time which is an invariable constant and change which is a variable constant.
It is important to only change one variable at a time when doing an experiment, because if you change more than one, there will be uncertainty as to which one affected the result.
if you change more than one variable, you will not know which one has had an effect on the experiment. If the outcome changes when one variable is altered, then the change can only be due to the one variable, by logical deduction.
If you change more than one variable at a time, you will not be able to tell which variable is responsible for what change. Scientists need to know exactly which variable caused the observed experimental results.It is advantageous for scientists to test only one variable at a time during an experiment because if you change all variables at once, you will not be able to tell which variable is responsible for the observed results.
If you change more than one variable at a time, you will not be able to tell which variable is responsible for what change. Scientists need to know exactly which variable caused the observed experimental results.It is advantageous for scientists to test only one variable at a time during an experiment because if you change all variables at once, you will not be able to tell which variable is responsible for the observed results.
If you change more than one variable at a time, you will not be able to tell which variable is responsible for what change. Scientists need to know exactly which variable caused the observed experimental results.It is advantageous for scientists to test only one variable at a time during an experiment because if you change all variables at once, you will not be able to tell which variable is responsible for the observed results.
If you change more than one variable at a time, you will not be able to tell which variable is responsible for what change. Scientists need to know exactly which variable caused the observed experimental results.It is advantageous for scientists to test only one variable at a time during an experiment because if you change all variables at once, you will not be able to tell which variable is responsible for the observed results.
Because if you change more than one variable at a time, you can't tell which is affecting the results.
You only change one variable; if you changed multiple variables you wouldn't know which one caused a change.
You only change one variable in an investigation because if you change more than one you won't know which change affected the data.
um varible i think now
Because you want to see how the experimental results change due to only that one variable change. If you used two variables, and the results varied, how would you know which variable contributed more to the change if at all? It can be done this way, but one variable at a time will allow you to make sense of your data much more efficiently.
So the variable can be at constant.