Give her time to prepare an alibi. the story is very similar to one attributed to O.Henry with the memorable Punch Line- All of the Money was Confederate! Me note some vaguely anti-capitalist or even Communist overtones in stories of this anti-capital, social climbing missfires (Dollar signs in the sses.) tales. I don"t like it. It can also be argued Steinbeck"s (The Pearl) is a male variant on the Hope Diamond.
Mme Forestier likely did not contact Mme Loisel after the return of the necklace because she held disdain for Mme Loisel or didn't care about her circumstances. She may have thought that Mme Loisel got what she deserved for losing the necklace and didn't see the need to reach out. Alternatively, she could have been too busy or simply forgot about the incident.
No, Madame Forestier should not return the value of the original necklace and the replacement received from Madame Loisel in "The Necklace." Madame Loisel borrowed the necklace in good faith and returned a replacement, not knowing that it was a different necklace she was returning. Madame Forestier's actions carry some responsibility for what transpired.
No, Madame Forestier lied about the necklace being real and told Mathilde it was only costume jewelry. The Loisel's spent years paying off the debt they incurred to replace the necklace, not knowing its true value. Madame Forestier never sold the necklace or returned any money to the Loisels.
madame forestier is unhappy about the return of the necklace
Mme. Forestier's reaction when the necklace was returned was one of anger. She was not pleased that it took so long to get back because she may have needed to wear it sooner.
The party where Mathilde loses the necklace is likely the least important event in the story, as it is the catalyst for the ensuing conflicts and reflects Mathilde's desire for status and wealth.
In "The Necklace" by Guy de Maupassant, the antagonist can be seen as Mathilde's own greed, vanity, and desire for social status. The necklace itself also serves as a symbol of these negative qualities as it leads to the downfall of the main characters.
In an attempt to find Mme Forestier's necklace, Mathilde and her husband retraced their steps at the party, checked their clothes, and even visited the police station and pawn shops. They also posted advertisements offering a reward for its return, but their efforts proved unsuccessful.
There is more than one climax..The first one when she lost the necklace after the ball..and the second one... at the end when Mme. Loisel went and speak to Mme. Forestier about what happen to the necklace, it was a surprise ending climactic.
The reason she did not tell you is because you should have read the story
Madame Loisel cried because she lost the necklace that she borrowed from a friend to wear to a fancy event. She and her husband then spent years working to pay off the debt to replace the necklace, only to later discover it was fake. Her tears were a result of the realization of the years wasted due to a simple mistake.
The protagonist in "The Necklace" doesn't admit to her friend that she lost the necklace because of her pride and fear of judgment. She wants to maintain the appearance of wealth and doesn't want to face the consequences of her actions.
The setting of "The Necklace" is 19th-century France, primarily in Paris. The story takes place in various locations such as the protagonist Mathilde Loisel's modest apartment, elegant ballrooms, and streets of Paris. The setting plays a crucial role in highlighting the stark contrast between the social classes and the theme of materialism.