Want this question answered?
They kill more soldiers
Machine-gunner crews were more likely to be killed by the enemy than the foot soldiers because then they will lose more experienced soldiers and will lose effect of the use of the machine gun in the battle.
Generally, in wartime, spies know that if captured, spies of any nation in any war are likely to be shot. They are not often captured, however, and if captured are often not executed.
No one can say for sure, because those kind of statistics were not kept by either side. It is likely that tanks killed less people than aerial bombings, or artillery or infantry combat or starvation/disease. Also the Nazi Death Camps killed several millions of civilians, whereas tanks killed maybe a few hundred thousand soldiers at the most, primarily on the Eastern Front in Europe.
It included one of the earliest documented examples of "friendly fire" by trigger-happy US troops. About half of chief Bigfoot's 350 followers were killed in the fight, along with 25 of the US soldiers. 39 more soldiers were wounded. The troops were firing rifles and small artillery pieces (Hotchkiss guns) from all four sides at once, meaning that they had no chance of missing their own men on the opposite side of the camp. It is likely that practically all the US casualties were caused by US soldiers.
They kill more soldiers
I think that the machine-gunner crews were more likely to be killed by the enemy than foot soldiers, if they were captured because of the simple fact that they thought they should bring it among themselves to kill them instead of capturing them because that would be even harder.
I think that the machine-gunner crews were more likely to be killed by the enemy than foot soldiers, if they were captured because of the simple fact that they thought they should bring it among themselves to kill them instead of capturing them because that would be even harder.
Machine-gunner crews were more likely to be killed by the enemy than the foot soldiers because then they will lose more experienced soldiers and will lose effect of the use of the machine gun in the battle.
They believe 16 and 17 year old soldiers are more likely to be killed or injured.
He would have most likely been captured, tried, and publicly executed.
Dysentery killed most soldiers in the Civil War.
If he wasn't killed in the final battle, which given that he wasn't mentioned among the dead is likely, then he was probably captured by the Ministry and sent to Azkaban.
it was either brother's grim or the village most likely it will be dead birds
No, -soldiers seldom think deeply about the things their Commanders say.
I was
Yes. In the book, he is killed by Jonathan Harker and Quincey P. Morris.It is not clear how Vlad III, the real Dracula, died, but it is likely that he was beheaded by one of his own soldiers.