Want this question answered?
When the detectives confronted the criminal with hard evidence, he admitted to committing the crime.
There is no such evidence, as far as I know.
No. There is no evidence of the existence of ghosts or any other 'supernatural' phenomena.
All the empirical evidence available.
red drop phenomena and the emerson's experiment
A contradiction occurs when two statements cannot both be true at the same time, leading to inconsistency. An argument, on the other hand, involves presenting a claim supported by reasons and evidence to persuade others of its validity or truth. In an argument, the aim is to provide a coherent and logical explanation, while a contradiction highlights an inconsistency or conflict in statements.
It would be interesting to see this "proof" (correct term: evidence). No scientific investigation - and there have been plenty - has ever turned up any such evidence of paranormal phenomena. If and when it found something which was claimed as such, there was a perfectly rational and overly natural explanation. Since there is no such evidence, there is no way paranormal activity fits into the framework of any branch of biology, including evolution.
This is a "proof by contradiction", where the evidence would fail to support the reverse assumption, giving credence to the original hypothesis.
"Save the phenomena" means to explain observable facts or appearances in a way that is consistent with reality. Plato used this concept to emphasize the importance of relying on empirical evidence and observations in developing philosophical theories.
they know everything
You cannot proceed with the game if you have not received all the evidence. The evidence acts as a trigger to continue the story.
No. Though some people believe in all kinds of 'supernatural' phenomena. There is no irrefutable evidence that any such thing as ghosts exist.